» Articles » PMID: 26973553

Faces with Light Makeup Are Better Recognized Than Faces with Heavy Makeup

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Mar 15
PMID 26973553
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many women wear facial makeup to accentuate their appeal and attractiveness. Makeup may vary from natural (light) to glamorous (heavy), depending of the context of interpersonal situations, an emphasis on femininity, and current societal makeup trends. This study examined how light makeup and heavy makeup influenced attractiveness ratings and facial recognition. In a rating task, 38 Japanese women assigned attractiveness ratings to 36 Japanese female faces with no makeup, light makeup, and heavy makeup (12 each). In a subsequent recognition task, the participants were presented with 36 old and 36 new faces. Results indicated that attractiveness was rated highest for the light makeup faces and lowest for the no makeup faces. In contrast, recognition performance was higher for the no makeup and light make up faces than for the heavy makeup faces. Faces with heavy makeup produced a higher rate of false recognition than did other faces, possibly because heavy makeup creates an impression of the style of makeup itself, rather than the individual wearing the makeup. The present study suggests that light makeup is preferable to heavy makeup in that light makeup does not interfere with individual recognition and gives beholders positive impressions.

Citing Articles

What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters.

Gulati A, Martinez-Garcia M, Fernandez D, Lozano M, Lepri B, Oliver N R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(11):240882.

PMID: 39606589 PMC: 11597472. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240882.


Relationships between subjective experience, electroencephalogram, and heart rate variability during a series of cosmetic behavior.

Moriya H, Machida A, Munakata T, Herai T, Tagai K Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1225737.

PMID: 38807957 PMC: 11130498. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1225737.


Salon nail care with superficial self-disclosure vitalizes psychological state.

Kawakubo A, Oguchi T Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1112110.

PMID: 37799518 PMC: 10548882. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112110.


materialmodifier: An R package of photo editing effects for material perception research.

Tsuda H, Kawabata H Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(3):2657-2674.

PMID: 37162649 PMC: 10991072. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02116-2.


Cosmetic makeup enhances facial attractiveness and affective neural responses.

Arai T, Nittono H PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272923.

PMID: 35969525 PMC: 9377592. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272923.


References
1.
Marzi T, Viggiano M . When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol. 2010; 84(2):192-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.013. View

2.
Kikuchi K, Masuda Y, Yamashita T, Kawai E, Hirao T . Image analysis of skin color heterogeneity focusing on skin chromophores and the age-related changes in facial skin. Skin Res Technol. 2014; 21(2):175-83. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12174. View

3.
Russell R . Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features. Perception. 2003; 32(9):1093-107. DOI: 10.1068/p5101. View

4.
Lorenzo G, Biesanz J, Human L . What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood. Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(12):1777-82. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610388048. View

5.
Lemay Jr E, Clark M, Greenberg A . What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010; 36(3):339-53. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209359700. View