» Articles » PMID: 26973053

Micro-shear Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements to Ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM Block Materials

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 Mar 15
PMID 26973053
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydrofluoric acid treatment on bond strength of resin cements to three different types of ceramic/glass containing CAD-CAM block composite materials.

Methods: CAD-CAM block materials of polymer infiltrated (Vita Enamic), resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate) and nanoceramic (Cerasmart) with a thickness of 1.5mm were randomly divided into two groups according to the surface treatment performed. In Group 1, specimens were wet-ground with silicon carbide abrasive papers up to no. 1000. In Group 2, 9.6% hydrofluoric acid gel was applied to ceramics. Three different resin cements (RelyX, Variolink Esthetic and G-CEM LinkAce) were applied to the tubes in 1.2-mm thick increments and light-cured for 40s using LED light curing unit. Half of the specimens (n=10) were submitted to thermal cycling (5000 cycles, 5-55°C). The strength measurements were accomplished with a universal testing machine (Lloyd Instruments) at a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min until the failure occurs. Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. The data were analyzed with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc tests (α=0.05).

Results: There were significant differences between ceramics and resin cements (p<0.001). However, hydrofluoric acid gel treatment had no effect on bond strength values (p=0.073). In addition, thermal cycling significantly decreased bond strength values of resin cements to ceramics (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Use of appropriate resin cement systems with different ceramic/glass-polymer materials might promote the bonding capacity of these systems.

Citing Articles

Bond strength of conventional resin-based adhesive cement and self-adhesive resin cement to CAD-CAM restorative materials.

Senol M, Gurbuz A, Oyar P BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):296.

PMID: 39994593 PMC: 11853663. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05527-z.


Bonding effectiveness of multi-step adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM blocks: impact of thermal cycling and surface treatment methods.

Aladag S, Ayaz E BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1326.

PMID: 39487437 PMC: 11529232. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05091-y.


A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength between a Luting Composite Resin and Both Machinable and Printable Ceramic-Glass Polymer Materials.

Aydin N, Celik Oge S, Guney O, Okbaz O, Sertdemir Y Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(19).

PMID: 39410268 PMC: 11477453. DOI: 10.3390/ma17194697.


Effect of Surface Treatments Applied to 3D Printed Permanent Resins on Shear Bond Strength.

Ersoz B, Aydin N, Ezmek B, Karaoglanoglu S, Cal I J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(9):e1059-e1066.

PMID: 39399858 PMC: 11470446. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61884.


Effect of surface treatment strategies on bond strength of additively and subtractively manufactured hybrid materials for permanent crowns.

Mao Z, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Yassine J, Hey J, Prause E Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(7):371.

PMID: 38869697 PMC: 11176235. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05767-3.