» Articles » PMID: 26972545

Retrospective Study to Determine the Accuracy of Template-guided Implant Placement Using a Novel Nonradiologic Evaluation Method

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Mar 15
PMID 26972545
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: With a novel, noninvasive method for determining three-dimensional accuracy, the realized implant position relative to the planned implant position was analyzed retrospectively. Additional postoperative cone beam computed tomography was thus dispensable.

Study Design: Twelve cases with distal extension situations (DESs) or single tooth gaps (STGs) were evaluated. The data sets of the planned implant position were superimposed on the actually achieved implant position, retrieved from digitizing the implant impression. The deviations were measured and statistically analyzed.

Results: The mean deviation was 5° in the DES group and 4° in the STG group for the implant axes, 1 mm (DES) and 0.9 mm (STG) at the implant neck, and 1.6 mm (DES) and 1.5 mm (STG) at the implant apex. The mean height discrepancy was 0.5 mm (DES) and 0.5 mm (STG). No significant differences (P > .05) were found between the DES and STG groups.

Conclusions: The innovative, noninvasive evaluation method is suitable and sufficiently accurate for the assessment of larger cohorts. The results of our study showed a sufficiently high degree of accuracy when using a virtual planning program for which no radiopaque template is needed when performing cone beam computed tomography.

Citing Articles

Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of a custom-made, fully guided implant system for flapless crestal sinus floor elevation: Accuracy and patient-reported outcomes.

Kim J, Park J, Lee J, Kim D, Lee J, Jung U Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024; 35(12):1531-1545.

PMID: 39101395 PMC: 11629462. DOI: 10.1111/clr.14341.


Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients: a prospective observational study.

Chrabieh E, Hanna C, Mrad S, Rameh S, Bassil J, Zaarour J Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):36.

PMID: 39012381 PMC: 11252094. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z.


Digital registration versus cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating implant position: a prospective cohort study.

Han X, Wei D, Jiang X, Di P, Yi C, Lin Y BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):304.

PMID: 38438985 PMC: 10913533. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04088-x.


Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement with Dynamic Navigation-Investigation of the Influence of Two Different Optical Reference Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Knipper A, Kuhn K, Luthardt R, Schnutenhaus S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391641 PMC: 10886004. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020155.


Dynamic Implant Surgery-An Accurate Alternative to Stereolithographic Guides-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marques-Guasch J, Bofarull-Ballus A, Giralt-Hernando M, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Gargallo-Albiol J Dent J (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37366673 PMC: 10297201. DOI: 10.3390/dj11060150.