» Articles » PMID: 26968741

Changes in Extraocular Muscle Volume During Ocular Duction

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Mar 13
PMID 26968741
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: It has been tacitly assumed that overall extraocular muscle (EOM) volume is conserved during contraction and relaxation, yet this assumption has been untested up to now. We used high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine if total EOM volume changes during relaxation and contraction.

Methods: Surface coil MRI in quasi-coronal planes was obtained in target-controlled, maximal secondary gaze positions in 30 orbits of 15 normal subjects at 312-μm resolution. Ductions were quantified by changes in globe-optic nerve positions. Cross-sections of EOM were manually outlined in contiguous image planes so that volumes could be calculated by multiplying summed cross sections by the 2-mm slice thickness. Three-dimensional reconstruction allowed measurement of the lengths of terminal, unresolvable EOM segments, providing estimates of terminal EOM volumes to be summed with measured midorbital volumes to obtain total EOM volumes.

Results: Duction range averaged 44.3 ± 4.8° from relaxation to contraction. There was a significant increase in total volume in each rectus EOM from relaxation to contraction: superior rectus (SR) 92 ± 36 mm3 (+18%, P < 10-11); inferior rectus (IR) 51 ± 18 mm3 (+9%, P < 10-11); medial rectus (MR) 78 ± 36 mm3 (+11%, P < 10-5); and lateral rectus (LR) 47 ± 45 mm3 (+7%, P = 0.005). Because volume changes for SR and MR exceed IR and LR, total rectus EOM volume increases in supraduction 41 ± 42 mm3 (+3.7%) and adduction 32 ± 63 mm3 (+2.3%).

Conclusions: Total EOM volume is not conserved but instead increases with contraction and decreased with relaxation. Contractile volume increases may be secondary to increased actin-myosin lattice spacing, so that density decreases. This effect is opposite that of possible hemodynamic changes.

Citing Articles

Finite element modeling of effects of tissue property variation on human optic nerve tethering during adduction.

Park J, Shin A, Demer J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18985.

PMID: 36347907 PMC: 9643519. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22899-2.


Finite Element Model of Ocular Adduction by Active Extraocular Muscle Contraction.

Jafari S, Lu Y, Park J, Demer J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021; 62(1):1.

PMID: 33393967 PMC: 7794280. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.62.1.1.


Functional Anatomy of Muscle Mechanisms: Compensating Vertical Heterophoria.

Demer J, Clark R Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; 221:137-146.

PMID: 32918906 PMC: 7736372. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.002.


Functional anatomy of extraocular muscles during human vergence compensation of horizontal heterophoria.

Demer J, Clark R J Neurophysiol. 2019; 122(1):105-117.

PMID: 31042451 PMC: 6689778. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00152.2019.


Functional anatomy of human extraocular muscles during fusional divergence.

Demer J, Clark R J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120(5):2571-2582.

PMID: 30230991 PMC: 6295544. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00485.2018.


References
1.
APT L, Call N . An anatomical reevaluation of rectus muscle insertions. Ophthalmic Surg. 1982; 13(2):108-12. View

2.
Miller J . Functional anatomy of normal human rectus muscles. Vision Res. 1989; 29(2):223-40. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90126-0. View

3.
Demer J, Miller J, Koo E, Rosenbaum A . Quantitative magnetic resonance morphometry of extraocular muscles: a new diagnostic tool in paralytic strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1994; 31(3):177-88. DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19940501-10. View

4.
Demer J, Miller J . Magnetic resonance imaging of the functional anatomy of the superior oblique muscle. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36(5):906-13. View

5.
Demer J, Ortube M, Engle E, Thacker N . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates abnormalities of motor nerves and extraocular muscles in patients with neuropathic strabismus. J AAPOS. 2006; 10(2):135-42. PMC: 1847327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.12.006. View