The Organelle of Differentiation in Embryos: the Cell State Splitter

Overview

Journal Theor Biol Med Model

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2016 Mar 12

PMID 26965444

Citations 3

Authors

Natalie K Gordon

Richard Gordon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The cell state splitter is a membraneless organelle at the apical end of each epithelial cell in a developing embryo. It consists of a microfilament ring and an intermediate filament ring subtending a microtubule mat. The microtubules and microfilament ring are in mechanical opposition as in a tensegrity structure. The cell state splitter is bistable, perturbations causing it to contract or expand radially. The intermediate filament ring provides metastability against small perturbations. Once this snap-through organelle is triggered, it initiates signal transduction to the nucleus, which changes gene expression in one of two readied manners, causing its cell to undergo a step of determination and subsequent differentiation. The cell state splitter also triggers the cell state splitters of adjacent cells to respond, resulting in a differentiation wave. Embryogenesis may be represented then as a bifurcating differentiation tree, each edge representing one cell type. In combination with the differentiation waves they propagate, cell state splitters explain the spatiotemporal course of differentiation in the developing embryo. This review is excerpted from and elaborates on "Embryogenesis Explained" (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2016).

Citing Articles

Embodied cognitive morphogenesis as a route to intelligent systems.

Alicea B, Gordon R, Parent J Interface Focus. 2023; 13(3):20220067.

PMID: 37065267 PMC: 10102728. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2022.0067.

Effect of Klotho protein during porcine oocyte maturation via Wnt signaling.

Kim E, Taweechaipaisankul A, Ridlo M, Kim G, Lee B Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(23):23808-23821.

PMID: 33176278 PMC: 7762469. DOI: 10.18632/aging.104002.

Quantifying Mosaic Development: Towards an Evo-Devo Postmodern Synthesis of the Evolution of Development via Differentiation Trees of Embryos.

Alicea B, Gordon R Biology (Basel). 2016; 5(3).

PMID: 27548240 PMC: 5037352. DOI: 10.3390/biology5030033.

References

Nishida H, Stach T . Cell lineages and fate maps in tunicates: conservation and modification. Zoolog Sci. 2014; 31(10):645-52. DOI: 10.2108/zs140117. View

Rao Y, Wang Z, Chai X, Wu G, Zhou M, Nie Q . Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus. Biol Direct. 2010; 5:35. PMC: 2883972. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-5-35. View

Ibanes M, Izpisua Belmonte J . Theoretical and experimental approaches to understand morphogen gradients. Mol Syst Biol. 2008; 4:176. PMC: 2290935. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2008.14. View

Lucas J, Nadeau J, Sack F . Microtubule arrays and Arabidopsis stomatal development. J Exp Bot. 2005; 57(1):71-9. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erj017. View

Greese B, Wester K, Bensch R, Ronneberger O, Timmer J, Huulskamp M . Influence of cell-to-cell variability on spatial pattern formation. IET Syst Biol. 2012; 6(4):143-53. DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2011.0050. View

Tucker J . Microtubules and a contractile ring of microfilaments associated with a cleavage furrow. J Cell Sci. 1971; 8(2):557-71. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.8.2.557. View

Tuszynski J, Gordon R . A mean field Ising model for cortical rotation in amphibian one-cell stage embryos. Biosystems. 2012; 109(3):381-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.05.007. View

Payne S, Li B, Cao Y, Schaeffer D, Ryser M, You L . Temporal control of self-organized pattern formation without morphogen gradients in bacteria. Mol Syst Biol. 2013; 9:697. PMC: 3817405. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2013.55. View

Martin A, Goldstein B . Apical constriction: themes and variations on a cellular mechanism driving morphogenesis. Development. 2014; 141(10):1987-98. PMC: 4011084. DOI: 10.1242/dev.102228. View

10.

Bursa J, Lebis R, Holata J . Tensegrity finite element models of mechanical tests of individual cells. Technol Health Care. 2012; 20(2):135-50. DOI: 10.3233/THC-2011-0663. View

11.

Ishihara S, Sugimura K . Bayesian inference of force dynamics during morphogenesis. J Theor Biol. 2012; 313:201-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.08.017. View

12.

Chiou K, Hufnagel L, Shraiman B . Mechanical stress inference for two dimensional cell arrays. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(5):e1002512. PMC: 3355066. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002512. View

13.

Cranston P, Veldhuis J, Narasimhan S, Brodland G . Cinemechanometry (CMM): A method to determine the forces that drive morphogenetic movements from time-lapse images. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010; 38(9):2937-47. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-9998-1. View

14.

Lobo D, Beane W, Levin M . Modeling planarian regeneration: a primer for reverse-engineering the worm. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(4):e1002481. PMC: 3343107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002481. View

15.

Yang C, Ye Z . Trichomes as models for studying plant cell differentiation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012; 70(11):1937-48. PMC: 11113616. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1147-6. View

16.

Bergmann S, Sandler O, Sberro H, Shnider S, Schejter E, Shilo B . Pre-steady-state decoding of the Bicoid morphogen gradient. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(2):e46. PMC: 1790957. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050046. View

17.

Schulze J, Schierenberg E . Embryogenesis of Romanomermis culicivorax: an alternative way to construct a nematode. Dev Biol. 2009; 334(1):10-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.009. View

18.

Deblandre G, Wettstein D, Kintner C . A two-step mechanism generates the spacing pattern of the ciliated cells in the skin of Xenopus embryos. Development. 1999; 126(21):4715-28. DOI: 10.1242/dev.126.21.4715. View

19.

Gerstein M, Rozowsky J, Yan K, Wang D, Cheng C, Brown J . Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species. Nature. 2014; 512(7515):445-8. PMC: 4155737. DOI: 10.1038/nature13424. View

20.

Lander A, Nie Q, Wan F . Do morphogen gradients arise by diffusion?. Dev Cell. 2002; 2(6):785-96. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00179-x. View