» Articles » PMID: 26963609

Non-Euclidean Classification of Medically Imaged Objects Via S-reps

Overview
Journal Med Image Anal
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2016 Mar 11
PMID 26963609
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classifying medically imaged objects, e.g., into diseased and normal classes, has been one of the important goals in medical imaging. We propose a novel classification scheme that uses a skeletal representation to provide rich non-Euclidean geometric object properties. Our statistical method combines distance weighted discrimination (DWD) with a carefully chosen Euclideanization which takes full advantage of the geometry of the manifold on which these non-Euclidean geometric object properties (GOPs) live. Our method is evaluated via the task of classifying 3D hippocampi between schizophrenics and healthy controls. We address three central questions. 1) Does adding shape features increase discriminative power over the more standard classification based only on global volume? 2) If so, does our skeletal representation provide greater discriminative power than a conventional boundary point distribution model (PDM)? 3) Especially, is Euclideanization of non-Euclidean shape properties important in achieving high discriminative power? Measuring the capability of a method in terms of area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, we show that our proposed method achieves strongly better classification than both the classification method based on global volume alone and the s-rep-based classification method without proper Euclideanization of non-Euclidean GOPs. We show classification using Euclideanized s-reps is also superior to classification using PDMs, whether the PDMs are first Euclideanized or not. We also show improved performance with Euclideanized boundary PDMs over non-linear boundary PDMs. This demonstrates the benefit that proper Euclideanization of non-Euclidean GOPs brings not only to s-rep-based classification but also to PDM-based classification.

Citing Articles

Skeletons, Object Shape, Statistics.

Pizer S, Marron J, Damon J, Vicory J, Krishna A, Liu Z Front Comput Sci. 2023; 4.

PMID: 37692198 PMC: 10488910. DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2022.842637.


Skeletal model-based analysis of the tricuspid valve in hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Vicory J, Herz C, Han Y, Allemang D, Flynn M, Cianciulli A Stat Atlases Comput Models Heart. 2023; 13593:258-268.

PMID: 36848309 PMC: 9949511. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23443-9_24.


Fitting unbranching skeletal structures to objects.

Liu Z, Hong J, Vicory J, Damon J, Pizer S Med Image Anal. 2021; 70:102020.

PMID: 33743355 PMC: 8451985. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102020.


Diffeomorphic Medial Modeling.

Yushkevich P, Aly A, Wang J, Xie L, Gorman R, Younes L Inf Process Med Imaging. 2020; 11492:208-220.

PMID: 32410804 PMC: 7222280. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20351-1_16.


High throughput image labeling on chest computed tomography by deep learning.

Wang X, Teng P, Ontiveros A, Goldin J, Brown M J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020; 7(2):024501.

PMID: 32219151 PMC: 7082666. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.024501.


References
1.
Jung S, Dryden I, Marron J . Analysis of principal nested spheres. Biometrika. 2013; 99(3):551-568. PMC: 3635703. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ass022. View

2.
Styner M, Oguz I, Xu S, Brechbuhler C, Pantazis D, Levitt J . Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. Insight J. 2011; (1071):242-250. PMC: 3062073. View

3.
Qiao X, Zhang H, Liu Y, Todd M, Marron J . Weighted Distance Weighted Discrimination and Its Asymptotic Properties. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010; 105(489):401-414. PMC: 2996856. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm08487. View

4.
Kurtek S, Klassen E, Ding Z, Avison M, Srivastava A . Parameterization-invariant shape statistics and probabilistic classification of anatomical surfaces. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2011; 22:147-58. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22092-0_13. View

5.
Durrleman S, Prastawa M, Charon N, Korenberg J, Joshi S, Gerig G . Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters. Neuroimage. 2014; 101:35-49. PMC: 4871626. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.043. View