» Articles » PMID: 26957566

What Is a "Good" Treatment Decision? Decisional Control, Knowledge, Treatment Decision Making, and Quality of Life in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2016 Mar 10
PMID 26957566
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We explored whether active patient involvement in decision making and greater patient knowledge are associated with better treatment decision-making experiences and better quality of life (QOL) among men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Localized prostate cancer treatment decision making is an advantageous model for studying patient treatment decision-making dynamics because there are multiple treatment options and a lack of empirical evidence to recommend one over the other; consequently, it is recommended that patients be fully involved in making the decision.

Methods: Men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate cancer (N = 1529) completed measures of decisional control, prostate cancer knowledge, and decision-making experiences (decisional conflict and decision-making satisfaction and difficulty) shortly after they made their treatment decision. Prostate cancer-specific QOL was assessed at 6 months after treatment.

Results: More active involvement in decision making and greater knowledge were associated with lower decisional conflict and higher decision-making satisfaction but greater decision-making difficulty. An interaction between decisional control and knowledge revealed that greater knowledge was only associated with greater difficulty for men actively involved in making the decision (67% of sample). Greater knowledge, but not decisional control, predicted better QOL 6 months after treatment.

Conclusions: Although men who are actively involved in decision making and more knowledgeable may make more informed decisions, they could benefit from decisional support (e.g., decision-making aids, emotional support from providers, strategies for reducing emotional distress) to make the process easier. Men who were more knowledgeable about prostate cancer and treatment side effects at the time that they made their treatment decision may have appraised their QOL as higher because they had realistic expectations about side effects.

Citing Articles

Power asymmetry and embarrassment in shared decision-making: predicting participation preference and decisional conflict.

Scherer K, Budenbender B, Blum A, Grune B, Kriegmair M, Michel M BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025; 25(1):120.

PMID: 40065322 PMC: 11892210. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02938-4.


Adapting and Validating a Patient Prompt List to Assist Localized Prostate Cancer Patients with Treatment Decision Making.

Ross L, Collins L, Uzoaru F, Preston M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(19).

PMID: 39408161 PMC: 11477444. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12191981.


Predicting Functional Outcomes Following Dysvascular Lower Limb Amputation: An Evidence Review of Personalizing Patient Outcomes.

Norvell D, Henderson A, Halsne E, Morgenroth D Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2024; 35(4):833-850.

PMID: 39389639 PMC: 11849136. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2024.06.005.


Making Choices: A Multi-institutional, Longitudinal Cohort Study Assessing Changes in Treatment Outcome Valuation for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer.

Antunez A, Sinco B, Saucke M, Bushaw K, Jensen C, Dream S Ann Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 38766877 PMC: 11576482. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006347.


Digital technology in medical visits: a critical review of its impact on doctor-patient communication.

Marino F, Alby F, Zucchermaglio C, Fatigante M Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1226225.

PMID: 37575567 PMC: 10412815. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1226225.


References
1.
Lopez M, Kaplan C, Napoles A, Hwang E, Livaudais J, Karliner L . Satisfaction with treatment decision-making and treatment regret among Latinas and non-Latina whites with DCIS. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 94(1):83-9. PMC: 3918475. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.005. View

2.
Lepore S, Helgeson V, Eton D, Schulz R . Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol. 2003; 22(5):443-52. PMC: 2593114. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.443. View

3.
Violette P, Agoritsas T, Alexander P, Riikonen J, Santti H, Agarwal A . Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: Systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(3):239-51. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21272. View

4.
Gwede C, Pow-Sang J, Seigne J, Heysek R, Helal M, Shade K . Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 104(7):1381-90. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21330. View

5.
Hovey R, Cuthbertson K, Birnie K, Robinson J, Thomas B, Massfeller H . The influence of distress on knowledge transfer for men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2012; 27(3):540-5. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0343-2. View