» Articles » PMID: 26957031

Three Dimensional Organization of Genome Might Have Guided the Dynamics of Gene Order Evolution in Eukaryotes

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 10
PMID 26957031
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In eukaryotes, genes are nonrandomly organized into short gene-dense regions or "gene-clusters" interspersed by long gene-poor regions. How these gene-clusters have evolved is not entirely clear. Gene duplication may not account for all the gene-clusters since the genes in most of the clusters do not exhibit significant sequence similarity. In this study, using genome-wide data sets from budding yeast, fruit-fly, and human, we show that: 1) long-range evolutionary repositioning of genes strongly associate with their spatial proximity in the nucleus; 2) presence of evolutionary DNA break-points at involved loci hints at their susceptibility to undergo long-range genomic rearrangements; and 3) correlated epigenetic and transcriptional states of engaged genes highlight the underlying evolutionary constraints. The significance of observation 1, 2, and 3 are particularly stronger for the instances of inferred evolutionary gain, as compared with loss, of linear gene-clustering. These observations suggest that the long-range genomic rearrangements guided through 3D genome organization might have contributed to the evolution of gene order. We further hypothesize that the evolution of linear gene-clusters in eukaryotic genomes might have been mediated through spatial interactions among distant loci in order to optimize co-ordinated regulation of genes. We model this hypothesis through a heuristic model of gene-order evolution.

Citing Articles

Convergent evolution of a genomic rearrangement may explain cancer resistance in hystrico- and sciuromorpha rodents.

Jain Y, Chandradoss K, A V A, Bhattacharya J, Lal M, Bagadia M NPJ Aging Mech Dis. 2021; 7(1):20.

PMID: 34471123 PMC: 8410860. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-021-00072-9.


tRNAs as a Driving Force of Genome Evolution in Yeast.

Guimaraes A, Correia I, Sousa I, Oliveira C, Moura G, Bezerra A Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:634004.

PMID: 33776966 PMC: 7990762. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.634004.


Evolutionary Loss of Genomic Proximity to Conserved Noncoding Elements Impacted the Gene Expression Dynamics During Mammalian Brain Development.

Bagadia M, Chandradoss K, Jain Y, Singh H, Lal M, Sandhu K Genetics. 2019; 211(4):1239-1254.

PMID: 30796012 PMC: 6456320. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.301973.


Conserved Gene Microsynteny Unveils Functional Interaction Between Protein Disulfide Isomerase and Rho Guanine-Dissociation Inhibitor Families.

Moretti A, Pavanelli J, Nolasco P, Leisegang M, Tanaka L, Fernandes C Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):17262.

PMID: 29222525 PMC: 5722932. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16947-5.


Genome urbanization: clusters of topologically co-regulated genes delineate functional compartments in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Tsochatzidou M, Malliarou M, Papanikolaou N, Roca J, Nikolaou C Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(10):5818-5828.

PMID: 28369650 PMC: 5449599. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx198.

References
1.
Berlivet S, Paquette D, Dumouchel A, Langlais D, Dostie J, Kmita M . Clustering of tissue-specific sub-TADs accompanies the regulation of HoxA genes in developing limbs. PLoS Genet. 2014; 9(12):e1004018. PMC: 3873244. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004018. View

2.
Roukos V, Misteli T . The biogenesis of chromosome translocations. Nat Cell Biol. 2014; 16(4):293-300. PMC: 6337718. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2941. View

3.
Satoh N, Rokhsar D, Nishikawa T . Chordate evolution and the three-phylum system. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1794):20141729. PMC: 4211455. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1729. View

4.
Maeso I, Irimia M, Tena J, Casares F, Gomez-Skarmeta J . Deep conservation of cis-regulatory elements in metazoans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1632):20130020. PMC: 3826494. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0020. View

5.
Lawrence J . Selfish operons: the evolutionary impact of gene clustering in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999; 9(6):642-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00025-8. View