» Articles » PMID: 26956980

A New Graft Material for Myringoplasty: Bacterial Cellulose

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 10
PMID 26956980
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We aimed to determine the success rate of bacterial cellulose (BC) myringoplasty in tympanic membrane (TM) perforation. We reviewed the clinical records of 12 patients (16 ears) who underwent BC myringoplasty for long-standing TM perforations (>6 months) between March 2012 and January 2015. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 12.8 (range 6-24) months. In all patients, the perforation involved less than 50 % of the tympanic membrane, and the air-bone gap was ≤30 dB on the operative side. The age, gender, preoperative air average, bone average, air-bone gap, perforation size and location, and postoperative TM microscopic examinations of the patients were recorded. Following the BC myringoplasty, complete coverage of the perforation occurred in the first 6 months in 13 of 16 ears (81.3 %), although retraction occurred in two of these ears within 6 months. In three ears (18.8 %), the perforation persisted during the first postoperative month. The pre- and postoperative average air threshold was 19.56 (range 7-75) and 15.69 (range 5-75) dB, respectively. The pre- and postoperative average air-bone gap was 9.25 (range 0-25) and 5.63 (0-25) dB, respectively. Both the air threshold and air-bone gap improved postoperatively (both p = 0.008). No complications such as infection and granulation tissue formation were detected in any patient. BC is a safe graft material that is inexpensive, easy-to-use, and provides a high success rate in small tympanic membrane perforations. However, further studies of large tympanic membrane perforations with more samples and long-term follow-up are required.

Citing Articles

Use of Industrial Wastes as Sustainable Nutrient Sources for Bacterial Cellulose (BC) Production: Mechanism, Advances, and Future Perspectives.

Kadier A, Ilyas R, Huzaifah M, Harihastuti N, Sapuan S, Harussani M Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(19).

PMID: 34641185 PMC: 8512337. DOI: 10.3390/polym13193365.


Cellulose-Based Fibrous Materials From Bacteria to Repair Tympanic Membrane Perforations.

Azimi B, Milazzo M, Danti S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:669863.

PMID: 34164386 PMC: 8215662. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.669863.


Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose as a Carrier of BMP-2 for Bone Regeneration in a Rabbit Frontal Sinus Model.

Koike T, Sha J, Bai Y, Matsuda Y, Hideshima K, Yamada T Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(15).

PMID: 31390730 PMC: 6696112. DOI: 10.3390/ma12152489.


Opportunities of Bacterial Cellulose to Treat Epithelial Tissues.

Anton-Sales I, Beekmann U, Laromaine A, Roig A, Kralisch D Curr Drug Targets. 2018; 20(8):808-822.

PMID: 30488795 PMC: 7046991. DOI: 10.2174/1389450120666181129092144.


Effect of hyaluronic acid with or without scaffold material on the regeneration of tympanic membrane perforations.

Lou Z Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 274(5):2353-2355.

PMID: 27356553 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4168-1.


References
1.
Hakuba N, Iwanaga M, Tanaka S, Hiratsuka Y, Kumabe Y, Konishi M . Basic fibroblast growth factor combined with atelocollagen for closing chronic tympanic membrane perforations in 87 patients. Otol Neurotol. 2009; 31(1):118-21. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c34f01. View

2.
Orji F, Agu C . Determinants of spontaneous healing in traumatic perforations of the tympanic membrane. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008; 33(5):420-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01764.x. View

3.
Mello L, Feltrin L, Fontes Neto P, Ferraz F . Duraplasty with biosynthetic cellulose: an experimental study. J Neurosurg. 1997; 86(1):143-50. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.1.0143. View

4.
Kim J, Kim S, Park S, Lim K, Seonwoo H, Kim Y . Bacterial cellulose nanofibrillar patch as a wound healing platform of tympanic membrane perforation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2013; 2(11):1525-31. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201200368. View

5.
Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D . Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011; 50(24):5438-66. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201001273. View