» Articles » PMID: 26943164

Leaf Color is Fine-tuned on the Solar Spectra to Avoid Strand Direct Solar Radiation

Overview
Journal J Plant Res
Specialty Biology
Date 2016 Mar 5
PMID 26943164
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spectral distributions of light absorption rates by intact leaves are notably different from the incident solar radiation spectra, for reasons that remain elusive. Incident global radiation comprises two main components; direct radiation from the direction of the sun, and diffuse radiation, which is sunlight scattered by molecules, aerosols and clouds. Both irradiance and photon flux density spectra differ between direct and diffuse radiation in their magnitude and profile. However, most research has assumed that the spectra of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) can be averaged, without considering the radiation classes. We used paired spectroradiometers to sample direct and diffuse solar radiation, and obtained relationships between the PAR spectra and the absorption spectra of photosynthetic pigments and organs. As monomers in solvent, the spectral absorbance of Chl a decreased with the increased spectral irradiance (W m(-2) nm(-1)) of global PAR at noon (R(2) = 0.76), and was suitable to avoid strong spectral irradiance (λmax = 480 nm) rather than absorb photon flux density (μmol m(-2) s(-1) nm(-1)) efficiently. The spectral absorption of photosystems and the intact thallus and leaves decreased linearly with the increased spectral irradiance of direct PAR at noon (I dir-max), where the wavelength was within the 450-650 nm range (R(2) = 0.81). The higher-order structure of photosystems systematically avoided the strong spectral irradiance of I dir-max. However, when whole leaves were considered, leaf anatomical structure and light scattering in leaf tissues made the leaves grey bodies for PAR and enabled high PAR use efficiency. Terrestrial green plants are fine-tuned to spectral dynamics of incident solar radiation and PAR absorption is increased in various structural hierarchies.

Citing Articles

2019 Awards in the Journal of Plant Research.

Hikosaka K J Plant Res. 2019; 132(4):459-460.

PMID: 31240425 DOI: 10.1007/s10265-019-01120-y.


Why is chlorophyll b only used in light-harvesting systems?.

Kume A, Akitsu T, Nasahara K J Plant Res. 2018; 131(6):961-972.

PMID: 29992395 PMC: 6459968. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-018-1052-7.


Importance of the green color, absorption gradient, and spectral absorption of chloroplasts for the radiative energy balance of leaves.

Kume A J Plant Res. 2017; 130(3):501-514.

PMID: 28293810 PMC: 5897488. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-017-0910-z.

References
1.
Brodersen C, Vogelmann T, Williams W, Gorton H . A new paradigm in leaf-level photosynthesis: direct and diffuse lights are not equal. Plant Cell Environ. 2007; 31(1):159-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01751.x. View

2.
Terashima I, Fujita T, Inoue T, Chow W, Oguchi R . Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50(4):684-97. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcp034. View

3.
Moss R, Loomis W . Absorption Spectra of Leaves. I. The Visible Spectrum. Plant Physiol. 1952; 27(2):370-91. PMC: 540339. DOI: 10.1104/pp.27.2.370. View

4.
Hogewoning S, Wientjes E, Douwstra P, Trouwborst G, van Ieperen W, Croce R . Photosynthetic quantum yield dynamics: from photosystems to leaves. Plant Cell. 2012; 24(5):1921-35. PMC: 3442578. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.097972. View

5.
Allorent G, Tokutsu R, Roach T, Peers G, Cardol P, Girard-Bascou J . A dual strategy to cope with high light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell. 2013; 25(2):545-57. PMC: 3608777. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.108274. View