» Articles » PMID: 26941696

Cross-Domain Statistical-Sequential Dependencies Are Difficult to Learn

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2016 Mar 5
PMID 26941696
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated participants' ability to learn cross-modal associations during statistical learning tasks. However, these studies are all similar in that the cross-modal associations to be learned occur simultaneously, rather than sequentially. In addition, the majority of these studies focused on learning across sensory modalities but not across perceptual categories. To test both cross-modal and cross-categorical learning of sequential dependencies, we used an artificial grammar learning task consisting of a serial stream of auditory and/or visual stimuli containing both within- and cross-domain dependencies. Experiment 1 examined within-modal and cross-modal learning across two sensory modalities (audition and vision). Experiment 2 investigated within-categorical and cross-categorical learning across two perceptual categories within the same sensory modality (e.g., shape and color; tones and non-words). Our results indicated that individuals demonstrated learning of the within-modal and within-categorical but not the cross-modal or cross-categorical dependencies. These results stand in contrast to the previous demonstrations of cross-modal statistical learning, and highlight the presence of modality constraints that limit the effectiveness of learning in a multimodal environment.

Citing Articles

Crossmodal interactions in human learning and memory.

Murray C, Shams L Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1181760.

PMID: 37266327 PMC: 10229776. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1181760.


Concurrent visual sequence learning.

Wilts S, Haider H Psychol Res. 2023; 87(7):2086-2100.

PMID: 36947194 PMC: 10457409. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01810-2.


Linking the neural basis of distributional statistical learning with transitional statistical learning: The paradox of attention.

Schneider J, Weng Y, Hu A, Qi Z Neuropsychologia. 2022; 172:108284.

PMID: 35667495 PMC: 10286817. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108284.


Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?.

Rottger E, Zhao F, Gaschler R, Haider H J Cogn. 2021; 4(1):1.

PMID: 33506167 PMC: 7792471. DOI: 10.5334/joc.136.


How does the brain learn environmental structure? Ten core principles for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical learning.

Conway C Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020; 112:279-299.

PMID: 32018038 PMC: 7211144. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.032.


References
1.
Jamieson R, Mewhort D . The influence of grammatical, local, and organizational redundancy on implicit learning: an analysis using information theory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(1):9-23. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.9. View

2.
Perruchet P, Pacton S . Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(5):233-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.006. View

3.
Thiessen E . Effects of visual information on adults' and infants' auditory statistical learning. Cogn Sci. 2011; 34(6):1093-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01118.x. View

4.
Christiansen M, Chater N . Language as shaped by the brain. Behav Brain Sci. 2008; 31(5):489-508. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X08004998. View

5.
Conway C, Christiansen M . Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(10):905-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x. View