» Articles » PMID: 26941514

The Influence of Soft Tissue Biotype on the Marginal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants: A 1-year Prospective Clinico-radiological Study

Overview
Date 2016 Mar 5
PMID 26941514
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The peri-implant mucosa undergoes surgical and bacterial assaults in various stages of implant therapy, however, the literature on changes occurring in the peri-implant mucosa is minimal. This study was thus conducted to evaluate the change in the peri-implant mucosal thickness and its effect on the marginal bone levels around dental implants treated in a conventional two-stage implant therapy.

Materials And Methods: A total of 36 implants were placed in 22 subjects. Two subjects dropped out. Thirty-three implants in 20 subjects were then evaluated. Initial mucosal thickness, marginal bone levels on radiographs, pain, and exudation were evaluated. All these parameters were recorded at the time of implant placement, at the time of cementation of final restoration, 6 months and 12 months post cementation/restoration.

Results: The peri-implant mucosal thickness reduced from implant placement to second stage and till restorations and was statistically significant, in both the thick and thin biotypes, however, at 12 months there was a rebound of the tissue thickness, which was more in the thick biotype (P < 0.05). At 1-year follow-up, there was a reduction in the marginal bone levels, which was more in the thick biotype as compared to the thin biotype (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The mucosa at implant sites undergoes a reduction in thickness from the time of implant placement till the placement of final restorations. The placement of the final restorations and then end of active therapy leads to a rebound of the tissue thickness. Sites with thicker tissues preoperatively have a lesser bone loss and better rebound as compared to thinner tissues.

Citing Articles

Assessment of implant stability with resonance frequency analysis and changes in the thickness of keratinized tissue and crestal bone level using cone-beam computed tomography in two-stage implants: A three-dimensional clinicoradiographic study.

Singh N, Rajesh N, Ramesh A J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2025; 28(3):368-375.

PMID: 39742066 PMC: 11684576. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_122_23.


Effect of L-PRF and autogenous bone grafts for immediate implant placement in post tooth extract socket.

Kukreja B, Ahmed Aseri A, Vashisht A, Patel H, Singhal P, Pattnaik N Bioinformation. 2024; 20(6):639-643.

PMID: 39131528 PMC: 11312316. DOI: 10.6026/973206300200639.


Efficacy of leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin membrane in immediate postextraction implant placement: A randomized controlled trial.

Soni M, Gugnani S, Pandit N, Bali D, Sharma M J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023; 27(1):63-69.

PMID: 36873981 PMC: 9979809. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_219_21.


Influence of different mucosal phenotype on early and long-term marginal bone loss around implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tang P, Meng Z, Song X, Huang J, Su C, Li L Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(4):1391-1407.

PMID: 36800027 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-04902-w.


Soft-Tissue Augmentation around Dental Implants with a Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) and Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix (CMX)-5-Year Follow-Up.

Hadzik J, Blaszczyszyn A, Gedrange T, Dominiak M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36769572 PMC: 9917401. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030924.


References
1.
Henry P . Oral implant restoration for enhanced oral function. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005; 32(1-2):123-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04140.x. View

2.
Nagpal S, Kamath S, Thakur S, Kulkarni S . Correlation between occlusal forces and marginal bone levels around implant-retained restorations: a clinico-radiological study. J Oral Implantol. 2010; 38(3):261-9. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00024. View

3.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A . The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1(1):11-25. View

4.
Novaes Jr A, Papalexiou V, Muglia V, Taba Jr M . Influence of interimplant distance on gingival papilla formation and bone resorption: clinical-radiographic study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21(1):45-51. View

5.
Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B, Marinello C . Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030102.x. View