» Articles » PMID: 26937245

Phylogenetic Relationships of the New World Titi Monkeys (Callicebus): First Appraisal of Taxonomy Based on Molecular Evidence

Abstract

Background: Titi monkeys, Callicebus, comprise the most species-rich primate genus-34 species are currently recognised, five of them described since 2005. The lack of molecular data for titi monkeys has meant that little is known of their phylogenetic relationships and divergence times. To clarify their evolutionary history, we assembled a large molecular dataset by sequencing 20 nuclear and two mitochondrial loci for 15 species, including representatives from all recognised species groups. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using concatenated maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses, allowing us to evaluate the current taxonomic hypothesis for the genus.

Results: Our results show four distinct Callicebus clades, for the most part concordant with the currently recognised morphological species-groups-the torquatus group, the personatus group, the donacophilus group, and the moloch group. The cupreus and moloch groups are not monophyletic, and all species of the formerly recognized cupreus group are reassigned to the moloch group. Two of the major divergence events are dated to the Miocene. The torquatus group, the oldest radiation, diverged c. 11 Ma; and the Atlantic forest personatus group split from the ancestor of all donacophilus and moloch species at 9-8 Ma. There is little molecular evidence for the separation of Callicebus caligatus and C. dubius, and we suggest that C. dubius should be considered a junior synonym of a polymorphic C. caligatus.

Conclusions: Considering molecular, morphological and biogeographic evidence, we propose a new genus level taxonomy for titi monkeys: Cheracebus n. gen. in the Orinoco, Negro and upper Amazon basins (torquatus group), Callicebus Thomas, 1903, in the Atlantic Forest (personatus group), and Plecturocebus n. gen. in the Amazon basin and Chaco region (donacophilus and moloch groups).

Citing Articles

A dataset of new occurrence records of primates from the arc of deforestation, Brazil.

Costa-Araujo R, Canale G, de Melo F, da Silva R, da Silva I, de Alencar R Primate Biol. 2024; 11(1):1-11.

PMID: 39045308 PMC: 11262026. DOI: 10.5194/pb-11-1-2024.


De Novo Genome Assembly for the Coppery Titi Monkey (Plecturocebus cupreus): An Emerging Nonhuman Primate Model for Behavioral Research.

Pfeifer S, Baxter A, Savidge L, Sedlazeck F, Bales K Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38758096 PMC: 11140417. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae108.


Using ecological niche modelling to prioritise areas for conservation of the critically endangered Buffy-Headed marmoset ().

Bataillard L, Eriksen A, de Melo F, Milagres A, Devineau O, Vital O Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(4):e11203.

PMID: 38584769 PMC: 10995821. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11203.


Moving.

Fragaszy D Am J Primatol. 2023; 87(2):e23571.

PMID: 37960946 PMC: 11090999. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23571.


Two hundred and five newly assembled mitogenomes provide mixed evidence for rivers as drivers of speciation for Amazonian primates.

Janiak M, Silva F, Beck R, de Vries D, Kuderna L, Torosin N Mol Ecol. 2022; 31(14):3888-3902.

PMID: 35638312 PMC: 9546496. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16554.


References
1.
Boubli J, Ribas C, Lynch Alfaro J, Alfaro M, Da Silva M, Pinho G . Spatial and temporal patterns of diversification on the Amazon: A test of the riverine hypothesis for all diurnal primates of Rio Negro and Rio Branco in Brazil. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014; 82 Pt B:400-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.005. View

2.
Alfaro M, Zoller S, Lutzoni F . Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20(2):255-66. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg028. View

3.
Hodgson J, Sterner K, Matthews L, Burrell A, Jani R, Raaum R . Successive radiations, not stasis, in the South American primate fauna. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(14):5534-9. PMC: 2667060. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810346106. View

4.
Lynch Alfaro J, Silva Jr J, Rylands A . How different are robust and gracile capuchin monkeys? An argument for the use of sapajus and cebus. Am J Primatol. 2012; 74(4):273-86. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22007. View

5.
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Hohna S . MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012; 61(3):539-42. PMC: 3329765. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. View