» Articles » PMID: 26933498

To Develop a Regional ICU Mortality Prediction Model During the First 24 h of ICU Admission Utilizing MODS and NEMS with Six Other Independent Variables from the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) Ontario, Canada

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2016 Mar 3
PMID 26933498
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) scoring systems or prediction models evolved to meet the desire of clinical and administrative leaders to assess the quality of care provided by their ICUs. The Critical Care Information System (CCIS) is province-wide data information for all Ontario, Canada level 3 and level 2 ICUs collected for this purpose. With the dataset, we developed a multivariable logistic regression ICU mortality prediction model during the first 24 h of ICU admission utilizing the explanatory variables including the two validated scores, Multiple Organs Dysfunctional Score (MODS) and Nine Equivalents Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS) followed by the variables age, sex, readmission to the ICU during the same hospital stay, admission diagnosis, source of admission, and the modified Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) collected through the hospital health records.

Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective cohort review of 8822 records from the Critical Care Trauma Centre (CCTC) and Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit (MSICU) of London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC), Ontario, Canada between 1 Jan 2009 to 30 Nov 2012. Multivariable logistic regression on training dataset (n = 4321) was used to develop the model and validate by bootstrapping method on the testing dataset (n = 4501). Discrimination, calibration, and overall model performance were also assessed.

Results: The predictors significantly associated with ICU mortality included: age (p < 0.001), source of admission (p < 0.0001), ICU admitting diagnosis (p < 0.0001), MODS (p < 0.0001), and NEMS (p < 0.0001). The variables sex and modified CCI were not significantly associated with ICU mortality. The training dataset for the developed model has good discriminating ability between patients with high risk and those with low risk of mortality (c-statistic 0.787). The Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test has a strong correlation between the observed and expected ICU mortality (χ (2) = 5.48; p > 0.31). The overall optimism of the estimation between the training and testing data set ΔAUC = 0.003, indicating a stable prediction model.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CCIS data available after the first 24 h of ICU admission at LHSC can be used to create a robust mortality prediction model with acceptable fit statistic and internal validity for valid benchmarking and monitoring ICU performance.

Citing Articles

Comparison of risk-adjusted cumulative quality control charts compared with standardized mortality ratios in critical care.

Martin C, Priestap F, Kao R Can J Anaesth. 2024; 72(2):353-363.

PMID: 39511046 PMC: 11870913. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-024-02863-6.


Forecasting ICU Census by Combining Time Series and Survival Models.

Murray L, Wilson J, Rodrigues F, Zaric G Crit Care Explor. 2023; 5(5):e0912.

PMID: 37168689 PMC: 10166346. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000912.


Red blood cell distribution width and Charlson comorbidity index help to identify frail polytraumatized patients : Experiences from a level I trauma center.

Weihs V, Frenzel S, Dedeyan M, Heinz T, Hajdu S, Frossard M Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022; 135(19-20):538-544.

PMID: 35943632 PMC: 10558364. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-022-02063-6.


Utilizing heart rate variability to predict ICU patient outcome in traumatic brain injury.

Zhang P, Roberts T, Richards B, Haseler L BMC Bioinformatics. 2020; 21(Suppl 17):481.

PMID: 33308142 PMC: 7734857. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03814-w.


Development and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for near-term in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19.

Parchure P, Joshi H, Dharmarajan K, Freeman R, Reich D, Mazumdar M BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020; .

PMID: 32963059 PMC: 8049537. DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002602.


References
1.
Knaus W, Zimmerman J, Wagner D, Draper E, LAWRENCE D . APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981; 9(8):591-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008. View

2.
Zhu B, Lemeshow S, Hosmer D, Klar J, Avrunin J, TERES D . Factors affecting the performance of the models in the Mortality Probability Model II system and strategies of customization: a simulation study. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24(1):57-63. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00011. View

3.
Xiao K, Guo C, Su L, Yan P, Li X, Xie L . Prognostic value of different scoring models in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome associated with acute COPD exacerbation. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(3):329-36. PMC: 4387415. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.11.27. View

4.
Cullen D, Civetta J, Briggs B, Ferrara L . Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974; 2(2):57-60. View

5.
Choi S, Lee J, Shin Y, Lee J, Jung J, Han M . Effects of a medical emergency team follow-up programme on patients discharged from the medical intensive care unit to the general ward: a single-centre experience. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 22(3):356-62. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12485. View