» Articles » PMID: 26928897

Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains

Overview
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2016 Mar 2
PMID 26928897
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increasingly, Tribal Nations are forming ethics review panels, which function separately from institutional review boards (IRBs). The emergence of strong community representation coincides with a widespread effort supported by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and other federal agencies to establish a single IRB for all multi-site research. This article underscores the value of a tribal ethics review board and describes the tribal oversight for the Safe Passage Study-a multi-site, community-based project in the Northern Plains. Our experience demonstrates the benefits of tribal ethics review and makes a strong argument for including tribal oversight in future regulatory guidance for multi-site, community-based research.

Citing Articles

Navigating University Openness in Research Policy Inconsistent with Indigenous Data Sovereignty: A Case Analysis.

Wick M, Erickson D, Hoffman J, Johnson L, Angradi T Ethics Hum Res. 2024; 46(2):2-15.

PMID: 38446108 PMC: 11044593. DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500202.


Inclusion of American Indians and Alaskan Natives in Large National Studies: Ethical Considerations and Implications for Biospecimen Collection in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study.

Bakhireva L, Nebeker C, Ossorio P, Angal J, Thomason M, Croff J Advers Resil Sci. 2023; 1(4):285-294.

PMID: 36710908 PMC: 9881679. DOI: 10.1007/s42844-020-00020-8.


Machine learning-based placental clusters and their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Petersen J, Parker S, Dukes K, Hutcheon J, Ahrens K, Werler M Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022; 37(4):350-361.

PMID: 36441121 PMC: 10175084. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12938.


Communicating Precision Medicine Research: Multidisciplinary Teams and Diverse Communities.

Beans J, Trinidad S, Blacksher E, Hiratsuka V, Spicer P, Woodahl E Public Health Genomics. 2022; 1-9.

PMID: 35998578 PMC: 9947193. DOI: 10.1159/000525684.


Considerations of sex and gender dimensions by research ethics committees: a scoping review.

Saxena A, Lasher E, Somerville C, Heidari S Int Health. 2022; 14(6):554-561.

PMID: 35043198 PMC: 9623496. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab093.


References
1.
Williams R, Willging C, Quintero G, Kalishman S, Sussman A, Freeman W . Ethics of health research in communities: perspectives from the southwestern United States. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8(5):433-9. PMC: 2939419. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1138. View

2.
Goodman M, Johnson Dias J, Stafford J . Increasing research literacy in minority communities: CARES fellows training program. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010; 5(4):33-41. PMC: 3177406. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.33. View

3.
Pritchard I . How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011; 6(2):31-46. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.31. View

4.
Sterling R . Genetic research among the Havasupai--a cautionary tale. Virtual Mentor. 2012; 13(2):113-7. DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.2.hlaw1-1102. View

5.
Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A . Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19:173-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. View