» Articles » PMID: 26925104

Biomechanical Performances of Networked Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate: Effect of Photoinitiator Concentration, Temperature, and Incubation Time

Overview
Journal Int J Biomater
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Mar 1
PMID 26925104
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nutrient conduit networks can be introduced within the Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate (PEGDA) tissue construct to enable cells to survive in the scaffold. Nutrient conduit networks can be created on PEGDA by macrochannel to nanochannel fabrication techniques. Such networks can influence the mechanical and cell activities of PEGDA scaffold. There is no study conducted to evaluate the effect of nutrient conduit networks on the maximum tensile stress and cell activities of the tissue scaffold. The study aimed to explore the influence of the network architecture on the maximum tensile stress of PEGDA scaffold and compared with the nonnetworked PEGDA scaffold. Our study found that there are 1.78 and 2.23 times decrease of maximum tensile stress due to the introduction of nutrient conduit networks to the PEGDA scaffold at 23°C and 37°C temperature conditions, respectively. This study also found statistically significant effect of network architecture, PI concentration, temperature, and wait time on the maximum failure stress of PEGDA samples (P value < 0.05). Cell viability results demonstrated that networked PEGDA hydrogels possessed increased viability compared to nonnetworked and decreased viability with increased photoinitiator concentrations. The results of this study can be used for the design of PEGDA scaffold with macrosize nutrient conduit network channels.

Citing Articles

Hydrogel mechanical properties in altered gravity.

Miskovic V, Greco I, Minetti C, Cialdai F, Monici M, Gazzi A NPJ Microgravity. 2024; 10(1):83.

PMID: 39117674 PMC: 11310329. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-024-00388-2.


Thermal, Mechanical and Biocompatibility Analyses of Photochemically Polymerized PEGDA for Photopolymerization-Based Manufacturing Processes.

Rekowska N, Huling J, Brietzke A, Arbeiter D, Eickner T, Konasch J Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(3).

PMID: 35336002 PMC: 8951438. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030628.


Evaluation of Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofiber-Composites for Artificial Skin Based on Dermal Fibroblast Culture.

Khandaker M, Nomhwange H, Progri H, Nikfarjam S, Vaughan M Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 35049727 PMC: 8773077. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9010019.


3D Printed Neural Regeneration Devices.

Joung D, Lavoie N, Guo S, Park S, Parr A, McAlpine M Adv Funct Mater. 2020; 30(1).

PMID: 32038121 PMC: 7007064. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201906237.


Gradient Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate and Cellulose Nanocrystals Tissue Engineering Composite Scaffolds via Extrusion Bioprinting.

Frost B, Sutliff B, Thayer P, Bortner M, Foster E Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019; 7:280.

PMID: 31681754 PMC: 6813186. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00280.


References
1.
Seki S, Iwamoto H . Disruptive forces for swine heart, liver, and spleen: their breaking stresses. J Trauma. 1998; 45(6):1079-83. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199812000-00019. View

2.
Durst C, Cuchiara M, Mansfield E, West J, Grande-Allen K . Flexural characterization of cell encapsulated PEGDA hydrogels with applications for tissue engineered heart valves. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7(6):2467-76. PMC: 4667841. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.018. View

3.
Yasar O, Lan S, Starly B . A Lindenmayer system-based approach for the design of nutrient delivery networks in tissue constructs. Biofabrication. 2010; 1(4):045004. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/1/4/045004. View

4.
Xin A, Gaydos C, Mao J . In vitro degradation behavior of photopolymerized PEG hydrogels as tissue engineering scaffold. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2006:2091-3. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260811. View

5.
Lee K, Mooney D . Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev. 2001; 101(7):1869-79. DOI: 10.1021/cr000108x. View