» Articles » PMID: 26924886

Anger, Control, and Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adulthood

Overview
Journal J Fam Violence
Date 2016 Mar 1
PMID 26924886
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A common theme in the literature is that intimate partner violence (IPV) is not about anger, but about power and control. While prior research has focused either on respondents' or partners' controlling behaviors, an interactionist perspective provides the basis for hypothesizing that both respondent and partner control will be significantly related to the odds of reporting perpetration, and that emotional processes are a component of IPV experiences. Analyses rely on interview data collected at waves 1 and 5 of a longitudinal study (Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study; n = 928) of adolescent and young adult relationships. Results indicate that after controlling for traditional predictors, both respondent and partner control attempts and measures of anger (including a measure of relationship-based anger) contributed significantly to the odds of reporting perpetration. Further, these patterns did not differ by gender, indicating some areas of similarity in the relationship and emotional processes associated with variations in men and women's IPV reports.

Citing Articles

You-talk in young adult couples' conflict: Family-of-origin roots and adult relational aggression sequelae.

Pettit C, Hellwig A, Costello M, Hunt G, Allen J J Soc Pers Relat. 2025; 41(12):3641-3664.

PMID: 39989474 PMC: 11845222. DOI: 10.1177/02654075241270998.


Quantifying Toxic Friendship: A Preliminary Investigation of a Measure of Victimization in the Friendships of Adolescents.

Dryburgh N, Martin-Storey A, Craig W, Holfeld B, Dirks M J Interpers Violence. 2024; 40(7-8):1800-1823.

PMID: 39360712 PMC: 11874602. DOI: 10.1177/08862605241265418.


The Boomerang Effect of Suppression of Emotional Expression: Relationship Power, Affectivity and Adolescent and Youth Male-To-Female Dating Violence.

Ubillos Landa S, Gonzalez S, Puente Martinez A, Leiva M, Castro J J Youth Adolesc. 2023; 53(1):36-52.

PMID: 37715863 PMC: 10761457. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-023-01854-y.


Gender, Relationship Concerns, and Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adulthood.

Giordano P, Grace M, Manning W, Longmore M J Fam Violence. 2023; 38(4):597-609.

PMID: 37206578 PMC: 10191165. DOI: 10.1007/s10896-022-00399-1.


"Micro-cultures" of conflict: Couple-level perspectives on reasons for and causes of intimate partner violence in young adulthood.

Giordano P, Grace M, Longmore M, Manning W J Marriage Fam. 2022; 84(4):1062-1080.

PMID: 36245675 PMC: 9545234. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12864.


References
1.
Ford K, Sohn W, Lepkowski J . American adolescents: sexual mixing patterns, bridge partners, and concurrency. Sex Transm Dis. 2002; 29(1):13-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-200201000-00003. View

2.
Dutton D . Trauma symptoms and PTSD-like profiles in perpetrators of intimate abuse. J Trauma Stress. 1995; 8(2):299-316. DOI: 10.1007/BF02109566. View

3.
Nemeth J, Bonomi A, Lee M, Ludwin J . Sexual infidelity as trigger for intimate partner violence. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012; 21(9):942-9. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3328. View

4.
Smith C, Ireland T, Park A, Elwyn L, Thornberry T . Intergenerational continuities and discontinuities in intimate partner violence: a two-generational prospective study. J Interpers Violence. 2011; 26(18):3720-52. DOI: 10.1177/0886260511403751. View

5.
Swan S, Gambone L, Fields A, Sullivan T, Snow D . Women who use violence in intimate relationships: the role of anger, victimization, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression. Violence Vict. 2005; 20(3):267-85. DOI: 10.1891/vivi.20.3.267. View