Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on Breastfeeding and Child Health Outcomes: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Matern Child Nutr

Specialties Gynecology & Obstetrics
Nutritional Sciences

Date 2016 Mar 1

PMID 26924775

Citations 200

Authors

Rafael Perez-Escamilla

Josefa L Martinez

Sofia Segura-Perez

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is a key component of the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. The primary aim of this narrative systematic review was to examine the impact of BFHI implementation on breastfeeding and child health outcomes worldwide and in the United States. Experimental, quasi-experimental and observational studies were considered eligible for this review if they assessed breastfeeding outcomes and/or infant health outcomes for healthy, term infants born in a hospital or birthing center with full or partial implementation of BFHI steps. Of the 58 reports included in the systematic review, nine of them were published based on three randomized controlled trials, 19 followed quasi-experimental designs, 11 were prospective and 19 were cross-sectional or retrospective. Studies were conducted in 19 different countries located in South America, North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, South Asia, Eurasia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Adherence to the BFHI Ten Steps has a positive impact on short-term, medium-term and long-term breastfeeding (BF) outcomes. There is a dose-response relationship between the number of BFHI steps women are exposed to and the likelihood of improved BF outcomes (early BF initiation, exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at hospital discharge, any BF and EBF duration). Community support (step 10) appears to be essential for sustaining breastfeeding impacts of BFHI in the longer term.

Citing Articles

Promoting breastfeeding in Singapore-a case study.

Lee Y, Lim C, Chng C, Chien C, Fong M BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025; 7(2):e000887.

PMID: 39882301 PMC: 11773668. DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000887.

Effects of an Online Theory-Based Educational Programme for Primiparous Women on Improving Breastfeeding-Related Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Wong M, Chien W Scand J Caring Sci. 2025; 39(1):e13320.

PMID: 39865520 PMC: 11771633. DOI: 10.1111/scs.13320.

A Mobile App for Promoting Breastfeeding-Friendly Communities in Hong Kong: Design and Development Study.

Fan H, Leung E, Lau K, Wong J, Choi E, Lam C JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9():e64191.

PMID: 39803717 PMC: 11741636. DOI: 10.2196/64191.

Perceived barriers and facilitators to breast-feeding support practices in hospitals and birthing facilities in the USA.

Kang B, Gonzalez-Nahm S, Benjamin-Neelon S Public Health Nutr. 2025; 28(1):e34.

PMID: 39764649 PMC: 11822633. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024002635.

Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Breastfeeding Periods in a Cohort of Spanish Primiparous Pregnant Women.

Bouzas C, Lopez-Garcia E, Sanchez-Martinez M, Tur J, Pastor R Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683481 PMC: 11643374. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234086.

References

. UNICEF launches the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1992; 17(4):177-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005721-199207000-00002. View

Murray E, Ricketts S, Dellaport J . Hospital practices that increase breastfeeding duration: results from a population-based study. Birth. 2007; 34(3):202-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00172.x. View

Moore E, Anderson G, Bergman N, Dowswell T . Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (5):CD003519. PMC: 3979156. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub3. View

Rosenberg K, Stull J, Adler M, Kasehagen L, Crivelli-Kovach A . Impact of hospital policies on breastfeeding outcomes. Breastfeed Med. 2008; 3(2):110-6. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2007.0039. View

Kramer M, Matush L, Vanilovich I, Platt R, Bogdanovich N, Sevkovskaya Z . Effect of prolonged and exclusive breast feeding on risk of allergy and asthma: cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2007; 335(7624):815. PMC: 2034727. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39304.464016.AE. View

Naylor A . Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding in the twenty-first century. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001; 48(2):475-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(08)70039-7. View

Pavicic Bosnjak A, Batinica M, Hegedus-Jungvirth M, Grguric J, Bozikov J . The effect of baby friendly hospital initiative and postnatal support on breastfeeding rates--Croatian experience. Coll Antropol. 2005; 28(1):235-43. View

Oliveira M, Camacho L, Tedstone A . A method for the evaluation of primary health care units' practice in the promotion, protection, and support of breastfeeding: results from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Hum Lact. 2003; 19(4):365-73. DOI: 10.1177/0890334403258138. View

Taddei J, Westphal M, Venancio S, Bogus C, Souza S . Breastfeeding training for health professionals and resultant changes in breastfeeding duration. Sao Paulo Med J. 2000; 118(6):185-91. PMC: 11175557. DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802000000600007. View

10.

Broadfoot M, Britten J, Tappin D, Mackenzie J . The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative and breast feeding rates in Scotland. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005; 90(2):F114-6. PMC: 1721844. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.041558. View

11.

Wright A, Rice S, Wells S . Changing hospital practices to increase the duration of breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 1996; 97(5):669-75. View

12.

Pincombe J, Baghurst P, Antoniou G, Peat B, Henderson A, Reddin E . Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative practices and breast feeding duration in a cohort of first-time mothers in Adelaide, Australia. Midwifery. 2007; 24(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.009. View

13.

Lutter C, Perez-Escamilla R, SEGALL A, Sanghvi T, Teruya K, Wickham C . The effectiveness of a hospital-based program to promote exclusive breast-feeding among low-income women in Brazil. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(4):659-63. PMC: 1380850. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.4.659. View

14.

Tham R, Bowatte G, Dharmage S, Tan D, Lau M, Dai X . Breastfeeding and the risk of dental caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015; 104(467):62-84. DOI: 10.1111/apa.13118. View

15.

Abolyan L . The breastfeeding support and promotion in Baby-Friendly Maternity Hospitals and Not-as-Yet Baby-Friendly Hospitals in Russia. Breastfeed Med. 2007; 1(2):71-8. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2006.1.71. View

16.

Beake S, Pellowe C, Dykes F, Schmied V, Bick D . A systematic review of structured compared with non-structured breastfeeding programmes to support the initiation and duration of exclusive and any breastfeeding in acute and primary health care settings. Matern Child Nutr. 2011; 8(2):141-61. PMC: 6860570. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00381.x. View

17.

Camurdan A, Ozkan S, Yuksel D, Pasli F, Sahin F, Beyazova U . The effect of the baby-friendly hospital initiative on long-term breast feeding. Int J Clin Pract. 2007; 61(8):1251-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.00926.x. View

18.

Horta B, Loret de Mola C, Victora C . Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015; 104(467):14-9. DOI: 10.1111/apa.13139. View

19.

Declercq E, Labbok M, Sakala C, OHara M . Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(5):929-35. PMC: 2667852. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.135236. View

20.

Helsing E, Chalmers B, Dinekina T, Kondakova N . Breastfeeding, baby friendliness and birth in transition in North Western Russia: a study of women's perceptions of the care they receive when giving birth in six maternity homes in the cities of Archangelsk and Murmansk, 1999. Acta Paediatr. 2002; 91(5):578-83. DOI: 10.1080/080352502753711722. View