Postoperative Socket Irrigation with Drinking Tap Water Reduces the Risk of Inflammatory Complications Following Surgical Removal of Third Molars: a Multicenter Randomized Trial

Overview

Journal Clin Oral Investig

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2016 Feb 29

PMID 26922634

Citations 13

Authors

H Ghaeminia

Th J M Hoppenreijs

T Xi

J P Fennis

T J Maal

S J Berge

G J Meijer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative irrigation of the socket with drinking tap water on inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal.

Material And Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was carried out from June 2013 to June 2014. In one arm of the study, patients were instructed to irrigate the tooth socket and surgical site with a Monoject® Curved 412 Tip Syringe (Tyco/healthcare-Kendall, Mansfield, MA, USA) with tap water. In a second arm of the study, the standard postoperative instructions did not include irrigation instructions. The incidences of alveolar osteitis and wound infection were recorded for each group and analyzed by the Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 280 patients with 333 mandibular third molars were analyzed. According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, inflammatory complications occurred in 18 cases in the Monoject® group (11.4 %) compared to 34 cases (19.1 %) in the control group (p = 0.04). These complications were associated with significant worse outcomes regarding quality of life, pain, and trismus and caused significantly more missed days of work or study. Female gender, age >26, bone removal, deep impacted third molars, less experienced surgeons, and a high amount of debris at the surgical site were also identified as risk factors for developing inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal.

Conclusion: Irrigation of the surgical site with drinking tap water using a curved syringe following removal of third molars is effective in reducing the risk of inflammatory complications.

Clinical Relevance: Water is a very accessible, cost-effective irrigant without side effects and the results from this study have proven that it can be used to reduce the risk of inflammatory complications and associated morbidity following lower third molar removal.

Citing Articles

Postextraction infections, prevention, and treatment.

Cao Y, Ye L, Pan J Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 42(4):426-434.

PMID: 39049629 PMC: 11338480. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023427.

Efficacy of analgesia promoted by lidocaine and articaine in third molar extraction surgery. A split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial.

Santos S, Bonatto M, Mendes P, Martins A, Pereira D, de Oliveira G Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024; 28(2):919-924.

PMID: 38355872 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-024-01223-4.

Evaluation of quality of life following dental extraction.

Fathima T, Kumar M J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2023; 13(Suppl 1):S102-S107.

PMID: 36643114 PMC: 9836172. DOI: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_361_22.

Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket).

Daly B, Sharif M, Jones K, Worthington H, Beattie A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 9:CD006968.

PMID: 36156769 PMC: 9511819. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006968.pub3.

Quality of life after extraction of mandibular wisdom teeth: A systematic review.

Hallab L, Azzouzi A, Chami B Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 81:104387.

PMID: 36147052 PMC: 9486647. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104387.

References

Lodi G, Figini L, Sardella A, Carrassi A, Fabbro M, Furness S . Antibiotics to prevent complications following tooth extractions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11:CD003811. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003811.pub2. View

Wijk A, Kieffer J, Lindeboom J . Effect of third molar surgery on oral health-related quality of life in the first postoperative week using Dutch version of Oral Health Impact Profile-14. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(5):1026-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.041. View

Larsen P . The effect of a chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49(9):932-7. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90055-q. View

Kolokythas A, Olech E, Miloro M . Alveolar osteitis: a comprehensive review of concepts and controversies. Int J Dent. 2010; 2010:249073. PMC: 2905714. DOI: 10.1155/2010/249073. View

Chuang S, Perrott D, Susarla S, Dodson T . Age as a risk factor for third molar surgery complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(9):1685-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.019. View

Smith K . Chlorhexidine gel reduces incidence of alveolar osteitis after extraction of the mandibular third molars. Evid Based Dent. 2009; 10(2):54-5. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400655. View

Delilbasi C, Saracoglu U, Keskin A . Effects of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid on the prevention of alveolar osteitis following mandibular third molar extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 94(3):301-4. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.125200. View

Nitzan D . On the genesis of "dry socket". J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983; 41(11):706-10. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90185-4. View

Hermesch C, Hilton T, Biesbrock A, Baker R, McClanahan S, Gerlach R . Perioperative use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of alveolar osteitis: efficacy and risk factor analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85(4):381-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90061-0. View

10.

Butler D, Sweet J . Effect of lavage on the incidence of localized osteitis in mandibular third molar extraction sites. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977; 44(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(77)90235-3. View

11.

Monaco G, Tavernese L, Agostini R, Marchetti C . Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing postoperative infection after mandibular third molar extraction in young patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(7):1467-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.066. View

12.

Coulthard P, Bailey E, Esposito M, Furness S, Renton T, Worthington H . Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (7):CD004345. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2. View

13.

Mahmood Hashemi H, Beshkar M, Aghajani R . The effect of sutureless wound closure on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 50(3):256-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.075. View

14.

Birn H . Fibrinolytic activity of alveolar bone in "dry socket". Acta Odontol Scand. 1972; 30(1):23-32. DOI: 10.3109/00016357209004589. View

15.

Malden N, Lopes V . Wrong message. Br Dent J. 2013; 214(10):485. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.487. View

16.

Lee C, Zhang S, Leung Y, Li S, Tsang C, Chu C . Patients' satisfaction and prevalence of complications on surgical extraction of third molar. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015; 9:257-63. PMC: 4332291. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S76236. View

17.

Larsen P . Alveolar osteitis after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Identification of the patient at risk. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992; 73(4):393-7. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90312-e. View

18.

Tjernberg A . Influence of oral hygiene measures on the development of alveolitis sicca dolorosa after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Surg. 1979; 8(6):430-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(79)80081-2. View

19.

Bienstock D, Dodson T, Perrott D, Chuang S . Prognostic factors affecting the duration of disability after third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(5):1272-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.211. View

20.

Lopez-Cedrun J, Pijoan J, Fernandez S, Santamaria J, Hernandez G . Efficacy of amoxicillin treatment in preventing postoperative complications in patients undergoing third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(6):e5-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.019. View