» Articles » PMID: 26916172

Safety and Efficacy in Parous Women of a 52-mg Levonorgestrel-medicated Intrauterine Device: a 7-year Randomized Comparative Study with the TCu380A

Overview
Journal Contraception
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Feb 27
PMID 26916172
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare rates of unintended pregnancy, method continuation and reasons for removal among women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel (daily release 20 microg) intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) or the copper T 380 A IUD (TCu380A).

Study Design: This was an open-label 7-year randomized controlled trial in 20 centres, 11 of which in China. Data on 1884 women with interval insertion of the LNG-IUD and 1871 of the TCu380A were analysed using life tables with 30-day intervals and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: The cumulative 7-year pregnancy rate of the LNG-IUD was 0.5 (standard error 0.2) per 100, significantly lower than 2.5 (0.4) per 100 of the TCu380A, cumulative method discontinuation rates at 7 years were 70.6 (1.2) and 40.8 (1.3) per 100, respectively. Dominant reasons for discontinuing the LNG-IUD were amenorrhea (26.1 [1.3] per 100) and reduced bleeding (12.5 [1.1] per 100), particularly in Chinese women and, for the TCu380A, increased bleeding (9.9 [0.9] per 100), especially among non-Chinese women. Removal rates for pain were similar for the two intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cumulative rates of removal for symptoms compatible with hormonal side effects were 5.7 (0.7) and 0.4 (0.2) per 100 for the LNG-IUD and TCu380A, respectively, and cumulative losses to follow-up at 7 years were 26.0 (1.4) and 36.9 (1.3) per 100, respectively.

Conclusion: The LNG-IUD and the TCu380A have very high contraceptive efficacy, with the LNG-IUD significantly higher than the TCu380A. Overall rates of IUD removals were higher among LNG-IUD users than TCu380A users. Removals for amenorrhea appeared culturally associated.

Implications: The 52-mg LNG-IUD and the TCu380A have very high contraceptive efficacy through 7 years. As an IUD, the unique side effects of the LNG-IUD are reduced bleeding, amenorrhea and symptoms compatible with hormonal contraceptives.

Citing Articles

Contraception with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus copper intrauterine device: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Liu P, Meng J, Xiong Y, Wu Y, Xiao Y, Gao S EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 78:102926.

PMID: 39610901 PMC: 11602564. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102926.


Risk factors of uterine perforation when using contraceptive intrauterine devices.

Tabatabaei F, Hosseini S, Hakimi P, Vejdani R, Khademi B BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):538.

PMID: 39334324 PMC: 11428400. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3.


S2k-Guideline Non-hormonal Contraception, Part 2: Intrauterine Devices and Sterilization: Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015 - 095, January 2024).

Bottcher B, Beckermann M, Berger B, Cremers J, DCosta E, Frank-Herrmann P Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024; 84(8):715-736.

PMID: 39114382 PMC: 11303009. DOI: 10.1055/a-2317-8993.


S2k-Guideline Non-hormonal Contraception, Part 1: Natural Family Planning, Lactational Amenorrhea, Barrier Methods, Coitus Interruptus: Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015 - 095, January 2024).

Bottcher B, Beckermann M, Berger B, Cremers J, DCosta E, Frank-Herrmann P Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024; 84(8):697-714.

PMID: 39114381 PMC: 11303010. DOI: 10.1055/a-2317-9133.


Trends in Continuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents Receiving Medicaid.

Allison B, Ritter V, Lin F, Flower K, Perry M J Adolesc Health. 2024; 75(3):487-495.

PMID: 38980246 PMC: 11330372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.04.029.


References
1.
Backman T, Rauramo I, Huhtala S, Koskenvuo M . Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190(1):50-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.021. View

2.
Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh T . Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015; 91(4):280-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.011. View

3.
French R, van Vliet H, Cowan F, Mansour D, Morris S, Hughes D . Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (3):CD001776. PMC: 8407482. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001776.pub2. View

4.
TIETZE C, Lewit S . Recommended procedures for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraception. Stud Fam Plann. 1973; 4(2):35-42. View

5.
LUUKKAINEN T, Allonen H, Haukkamaa M, Lahteenmaki P, Nilsson C, Toivonen J . Five years' experience with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs. Contraception. 1986; 33(2):139-48. DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(86)90080-6. View