» Articles » PMID: 26913857

Do CAS Measurements Correlate with EOS 3D Alignment Measurements in Primary TKA?

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Feb 26
PMID 26913857
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Objective of this study was to compare intraoperative computer-assisted surgery (CAS) alignment measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with pre- and postoperative coronal alignment measurements using EOS 3D reconstructions.

Methods: In a prospective study, 56 TKAs using imageless CAS were performed and coronal alignment measurements were recorded twice: before bone cuts were made and after implantation of the prosthesis. Pre- and postoperative coronal alignment measurements were performed using EOS 3D reconstructions. Thanks to the EOS radiostereography system, measurement errors due to malpositioning and deformity during acquisition are eliminated. CAS measurements were compared with EOS 3D reconstructions. Varus/valgus angle (VV), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured.

Results: Significantly different VV angles were measured pre- and postoperatively with CAS compared to EOS. For preoperative measurements, mLDFA did not differ significantly, but a significantly larger mMPTA in valgus was measured with CAS.

Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that differences in alignment measurements between CAS measurements and pre- and postoperative EOS 3D are due mainly to the difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing position and potential errors in validity and reliability of the CAS system. EOS 3D measurements overestimate VV angle in lower limbs with substantial mechanical axis deviation. For lower limbs with minor mechanical axis deviation as well as for mMPTA measurements, CAS measures more valgus than EOS. Eventually the results of this study are of clinical relevance, since it raises concerns regarding the validity and reliability of CAS systems in TKA.

Level Of Evidence: IIb.

Citing Articles

Strong Correlation Between Standing Long-Leg Radiographs and CT Scans in Measuring Coronal Knee Alignment.

Fontalis A, Luyckx T, Vanspauwen T, Moreels R, Mancino F, Raj R J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024; .

PMID: 38739702 PMC: 11593997. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01092.


Are torso asymmetry and torso displacements in a computer brace model associated with initial in-brace correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?.

Peeters C, Pijpker P, Wapstra F, Kempen D, Faber C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):361.

PMID: 37158905 PMC: 10165790. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06440-8.


Lower limb alignment becomes more varus and hyperextended from supine to bipedal stance in asymptomatic, osteoarthritic and prosthetic neutral or varus knees.

Brown M, Deakin A, Picard F, Riches P, Clarke J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(5):1635-1641.

PMID: 30415388 PMC: 6527790. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5273-z.


Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities.

Schoenmakers D, Feczko P, Boonen B, Schotanus M, Kort N, Emans P Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(11):3569-3575.

PMID: 28721459 PMC: 5644689. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4636-1.


Reliability of an Integrated Ultrasound and Stereophotogrammetric System for Lower Limb Anatomical Characterisation.

Greatrex F, Montefiori E, Grupp T, Kozak J, Mazza C Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017; 2017:4370649.

PMID: 28706440 PMC: 5494551. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4370649.


References
1.
Huang T, Hsu W, Peng K, Wen-Wei Hsu R, Weng Y, Shen W . Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(13):1197-202. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00325. View

2.
Seo S, Seo J, Sohn M, Kim Y . Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(10 Suppl):50-5. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-58. View

3.
Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J . Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5):682-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b5.14927. View

4.
Yau W, Leung A, Liu K, Yan C, Wong L, Chiu K . Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8):1150-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.10.010. View

5.
Bargren J, Blaha J, Freeman M . Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (173):178-83. View