» Articles » PMID: 26903496

Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes

Overview
Date 2016 Feb 24
PMID 26903496
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In an introductory biology course, we implemented a learner-centered, model-based pedagogy that frequently engaged students in building conceptual models to explain how genes determine phenotypes. Model-building tasks were incorporated within case studies and aimed at eliciting students' understanding of 1) the origin of variation in a population and 2) how genes/alleles determine phenotypes. Guided by theory on hierarchical development of systems-thinking skills, we scaffolded instruction and assessment so that students would first focus on articulating isolated relationships between pairs of molecular genetics structures and then integrate these relationships into an explanatory network. We analyzed models students generated on two exams to assess whether students' learning of molecular genetics progressed along the theoretical hierarchical sequence of systems-thinking skills acquisition. With repeated practice, peer discussion, and instructor feedback over the course of the semester, students' models became more accurate, better contextualized, and more meaningful. At the end of the semester, however, more than 25% of students still struggled to describe phenotype as an output of protein function. We therefore recommend that 1) practices like modeling, which require connecting genes to phenotypes; and 2) well-developed case studies highlighting proteins and their functions, take center stage in molecular genetics instruction.

Citing Articles

Changing colors and understanding: the use of mutant chromogenic protein and informational suppressor strains of to explore the central dogma of molecular biology.

DeWolf S, Van den Bogaard M, Hart R, Hartman S, Boury N, Phillips G J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023; 24(3).

PMID: 38107993 PMC: 10720536. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00094-23.


Missed connections: Exploring features of undergraduate biology students' knowledge networks relating gene regulation, cell-cell communication, and phenotypic expression.

Flowers S, Holder K, Rump G, Gardner S CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023; 22(4):ar44.

PMID: 37751503 PMC: 10756040. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0041.


Breaking the mold: Study strategies of students who improve their achievement on introductory biology exams.

Sebesta A, Bray Speth E PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0287313.

PMID: 37399176 PMC: 10317239. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287313.


Multiple-Gene Regulation for Enhanced Antitumor Efficacy with Branch-PCR-Assembled TP53 and MYC Gene Nanovector.

Cheng L, Lu L, Chen Z, Ma D, Xi Z Molecules. 2022; 27(20).

PMID: 36296536 PMC: 9609172. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27206943.


Using Systems and Systems Thinking to Unify Biology Education.

Momsen J, Bray Speth E, Wyse S, Long T CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022; 21(2):es3.

PMID: 35499820 PMC: 9508906. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0118.


References
1.
Kalinowski S, Leonard M, Andrews T . Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of DNA. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010; 9(2):87-97. PMC: 2879385. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.09-12-0088. View

2.
Bray Speth E, Shaw N, Momsen J, Reinagel A, Le P, Taqieddin R . Introductory biology students' conceptual models and explanations of the origin of variation. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014; 13(3):529-39. PMC: 4152213. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-02-0020. View

3.
Moss J, Kotovsky K, Cagan J . The role of functionality in the mental representations of engineering students: some differences in the early stages of expertise. Cogn Sci. 2011; 30(1):65-93. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_45. View