» Articles » PMID: 26900316

Parent Programs for Reducing Adolescent's Antisocial Behavior and Substance Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2016 Feb 23
PMID 26900316
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two theoretically based parent training programs, delivered in real-world settings by the social services, were examined in this randomized controlled trial for effectiveness in reducing adolescents' antisocial behavior and substance use. Two hundred and thirty-seven (237) adolescents in ages between 12 and 18 and their parents were assigned to one of two programs or to a wait-list control condition. The programs were the nine weekly group sessions program Comet 12-18 (Swedish Parent Management Training Program) and the six weekly ParentSteps (Swedish shortened version by Strengthening Families Program 10-14). Outcome measures were antisocial behavior, substance use, and delinquency, and psychosocial dysfunction. Data based on adolescents' and parents' ratings of the adolescents' problem behavior at baseline and 6 months later were analyzed with repeated measures ANVOA, Logistic regression, and Kruskal-Wallis test. The results showed that parents' ratings of adolescents' antisocial behaviors decreased significantly over time, but no time by group effect emerged. No program effects were found in the adolescents' self-reported antisocial behavior, delinquency, or psychosocial functioning. A threefold risk of illicit drug use was found in both intervention groups. The results suggest that neither Comet nor ParentSteps had beneficial effects on adolescent's antisocial or delinquent behavior, or on alcohol use. The only significant group difference found was a threefold risk of drug use in the intervention adolescents at follow-up, but for several reasons this finding should be interpreted with caution. : ISRCTN76141538.

Citing Articles

An attachment-based program for parents of youth with clinically significant mental health problems: Scaling up and drilling down to mechanisms of change.

Moretti M, Dys S, Craig S, Sierra Hernandez C, Goulter N, ODonnell K JCPP Adv. 2025; 5(1):e12248.

PMID: 40060003 PMC: 11889652. DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12248.


Family Intervention Models for Young Adults with Substance Abuse: A Systematic Review.

Binumon K, Ezhumalai S, Janardhana N, Chand P Indian J Psychol Med. 2024; :02537176241246042.

PMID: 39564277 PMC: 11572604. DOI: 10.1177/02537176241246042.


Treatment for problematic substance use in Nordic youth: a narrative review from the viewpoint of social services.

Kosonen J, Kuusisto K Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023; 18(1):70.

PMID: 38001531 PMC: 10675907. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00580-9.


Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.

MacArthur G, Caldwell D, Redmore J, Watkins S, Kipping R, White J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10:CD009927.

PMID: 30288738 PMC: 6517301. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.


Behavior Patterns of Antisocial Teenagers Interacting with Parents and Peers: A Longitudinal Study.

Cabrera F, Herrera A, Rubalcava S, Martinez K Front Psychol. 2017; 8:757.

PMID: 28626430 PMC: 5455015. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00757.


References
1.
Holstein B, Pedersen T, Bendtsen P, Madsen K, Meilstrup C, Nielsen L . Perceived problems with computer gaming and internet use among adolescents: measurement tool for non-clinical survey studies. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:361. PMC: 3990242. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-361. View

2.
Sundell K, Ferrer-Wreder L, Fraser M . Going Global: A Model for Evaluating Empirically Supported Family-Based Interventions in New Contexts. Eval Health Prof. 2013; 37(2):203-30. DOI: 10.1177/0163278712469813. View

3.
Stattin H, Enebrink P, Ozdemir M, Giannotta F . A national evaluation of parenting programs in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015; 83(6):1069-1084. DOI: 10.1037/a0039328. View

4.
Bowling A . Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005; 27(3):281-91. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi031. View

5.
Kumpfer K, Turner C . The social ecology model of adolescent substance abuse: implications for prevention. Int J Addict. 1990; 25(4A):435-63. DOI: 10.3109/10826089009105124. View