» Articles » PMID: 26900247

Post-laryngectomy Voice Rehabilitation with Voice Prosthesis: 15 Years Experience of the ENT Clinic of University of Catania. Retrospective Data Analysis and Literature Review

Overview
Date 2016 Feb 23
PMID 26900247
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study reports our 15-year experience, in Sicily, with the use of voice prostheses, analysing the different variables that have influenced the success or failure of speech rehabilitation. The retrospective clinical analysis was carried out by reviewing the clinical histories of 95 patients with laryngeal cancer, in whom a voice prosthesis had been placed by trachea-oesophageal puncture between 1998 and 2013. Age, type of tumour, type of surgery, use of prior radiation therapy, type of puncture, prosthesis used and its duration, number of replacements, complications and causes for prosthetic success or failure were analysed. The results showed a mean of Harrison-Robillard-Schultz (HRS) TEP rating scale of 11.8 in primary TEP and 12.6 in secondary TEP (P =0.613). PORT did not affect overall rehabilitation success. In these patients, the mean HRS rating scale was 11.2, with long-term success of 85% (P =0.582). In patients over 70 years old, long-term success was 82.5%, with 78% in primary and 86% in secondary TEP, the mean HRS was 11.2 in primary and 12 in secondary TEP (P =0.648). In total, long-term success was 87.5%, with 84% in primary and 91% in secondary TEP. The results obtained by retrospective analysis of 15 years of prosthetic rehabilitation in the Sicilian territory highlighted standard rehabilitation, in terms of intra and postoperative complications, fistula related pathology and overall success.

Citing Articles

Evidence-Based Recommendations in Primary Tracheoesophageal Puncture for Voice Prosthesis Rehabilitation.

Mayo-Yanez M, Klein-Rodriguez A, Lopez-Eiroa A, Cabo-Varela I, Rivera-Rivera R, Parente-Arias P Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38540616 PMC: 10970215. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12060652.


The Localisation of a Tracheoesophageal Shunt during Laryn(-gopharyn)gectomy Determines the Risk of Shunt Insufficiency.

Johnson F, Knopf A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137697 PMC: 10743495. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247628.


Biofilms on Voice Prosthesis - Challenges and Therapeutic Insights.

Caciandone-Cringureanu M, Anghel A, Anghel I Maedica (Bucur). 2023; 18(3):498-503.

PMID: 38023755 PMC: 10674123. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.3.498.


Analysis of durability and replacement of vocal prostheses in total laryngectomy patients at a head and neck surgery referral center.

Pires R, Gama R, da Silveira Junior P, Teixeira F, Santos C, Capuzzo R Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 281(1):351-357.

PMID: 37776343 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08180-w.


Voice-Related Quality of Life in Post-Laryngectomy Rehabilitation: Tracheoesophageal Fistula's Wellness.

Cocuzza S, Maniaci A, Grillo C, Ferlito S, Spinato G, Coco S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(12).

PMID: 32604875 PMC: 7344397. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124605.


References
1.
Op de Coul B, Hilgers F, Balm A, Tan I, van den Hoogen F, van Tinteren H . A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single Institution's experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126(11):1320-8. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.126.11.1320. View

2.
Lorenz K, Grieser L, Ehrhart T, Maier H . [Prosthetic voice restoration after laryngectomy: the management of fistula complications with anti-reflux medications]. HNO. 2010; 58(9):919-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-010-2127-5. View

3.
Brown D, Hilgers F, Irish J, Balm A . Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation: state of the art at the millennium. World J Surg. 2003; 27(7):824-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-003-7107-4. View

4.
Makitie A, Niemensivu R, Juvas A, Aaltonen L, Back L, Lehtonen H . Postlaryngectomy voice restoration using a voice prosthesis: a single institution's ten-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004; 112(12):1007-10. DOI: 10.1177/000348940311201202. View

5.
Blom E, SINGER M, Hamaker R . An improved esophageal insufflation test. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985; 111(4):211-2. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1985.00800060035001. View