» Articles » PMID: 26900146

Response to Therapy With Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both in Postmenopausal Women in the DATA (Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration) Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Densitom
Date 2016 Feb 23
PMID 26900146
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Both antiresorptive and anabolic osteoporosis medications increase bone mineral density (BMD), but no single agent can restore normal bone strength in most osteoporotic patients. Moreover, the magnitude and consistency of the patient response to each individual agent vary depending on the anatomic site. In the DATA study, we reported that in postmenopausal osteoporotic women, 2 years of combined denosumab and teriparatide increase mean BMD at the hip and spine more than either drug alone. In the current analysis, we wished to determine if the individual rates of BMD response were also greater among women treated with both drugs. In DATA, 94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (ages 51-91) were randomized to receive teriparatide (20 mcg subcutaneously daily), denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously every 6 mo), or both medications for 24 mo. The BMD of the total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The 82 subjects who completed all 2-yr treatments were analyzed. Responders were defined as experiencing BMD increases of >3%. An "excellent response" was defined as an increase of >6%. Over 24 mo, TH BMD increased by >3% in 36%, 53%, and 92% of women in the teriparatide, denosumab, and combination groups, respectively, and by >6% in 11%, 17%, and 50% in the teriparatide, denosumab, and combination groups, respectively (p < 0.01 for all comparisons vs combination). FN response rates were similar to TH. In the LS, BMD increased by >3% in 85%, 93%, and 100% of women in the teriparatide, denosumab, and combination groups, respectively (p = nonsignificant for all comparisons) and by >6% in 63%, 78%, and 100% of women in the teriparatide, denosumab, and combination groups, respectively (combination vs teriparatide, p = 0.001; combination vs denosumab, p = 0.016). In summary, more women treated with 24 mo of combined denosumab and teriparatide achieved a significant response at the TH and FN than those treated with either drug alone. All women treated with both agents together experienced an excellent response at the LS. These results support the continued investigation of combined denosumab and teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporotic women utilizing clinical endpoints such as fracture reduction.

Citing Articles

Fracture Non-Union in Osteoporotic Bones: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Orji C, Ojo C, Onobun D, Igbokwe K, Khaliq F, Ononye R Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69778.

PMID: 39429299 PMC: 11491133. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69778.


New Horizons: Translational Aspects of Osteomorphs.

Park-Min K, Mun S, Bockman R, McDonald M J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023; 109(5):e1373-e1378.

PMID: 38060842 PMC: 11031245. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad711.


Comparative study in estrogen-depleted mice identifies skeletal and osteocyte transcriptomic responses to abaloparatide and teriparatide.

Lv Z, Zhang J, Liang S, Zhou C, Hu D, Brooks D JCI Insight. 2023; 8(20.

PMID: 37870958 PMC: 10619488. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.161932.


A Delphi consensus on the management of Spanish patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: OSARIDELPHI study.

Arboleya L, Cancio-Trujillo J, Chaves C, Duaso-Magana E, Mesa-Ramos M, Olmos J Arch Osteoporos. 2023; 18(1):110.

PMID: 37610481 PMC: 10447260. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01318-7.


The why and how of sequential and combination therapy in osteoporosis. A review of the current evidence.

Chandran M Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022; 66(5):724-738.

PMID: 36382762 PMC: 10118820. DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000564.