» Articles » PMID: 26896051

Should We Add Visual Acuity Ratios to Referral Criteria for Potential Cerebral Visual Impairment?

Overview
Journal J Optom
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2016 Feb 21
PMID 26896051
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the assessment of visual acuity ratios might improve the referral of children with (sub)normal visual acuity but at risk of cerebral visual impairment.

Methods: In an exploratory study, we assessed visual acuity, crowding ratio and the ratios between grating acuity (Teller Acuity Cards-II) and optotype acuity (Cambridge Crowding Cards) in 60 typically developing school children (mean age 5y8m±1y1m), 21 children with ocular abnormalities only (5y7m±1y9m) and 26 children with (suspected) brain damage (5y7m±1y11m). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for targets and controls from the perspective of different groups of diagnosticians: youth health care professionals (target: children with any visual abnormalities), ophthalmologists and low vision experts (target: children at risk of cerebral visual impairment).

Results: For youth health care professionals subnormal visual acuity had the best sensitivity (76%) and specificity (70%). For ophthalmologists and low vision experts the crowding ratio had the best sensitivity (67%) and specificity (79 and 86%).

Conclusion: Youth health care professionals best continue applying subnormal visual acuity for screening, whereas ophthalmologists and low vision experts best add the crowding ratio to their routine diagnostics, to distinguish children at risk of visual impairment in the context of brain damage from children with ocular pathology only.

Citing Articles

Spectrum of Visual Dysfunction Detected by a Novel Testing Protocol Within a Special School Eye Care Service.

Musleh M, Green A, Mankowska A, Viner C, Pilling R Br Ir Orthopt J. 2024; 20(1):219-225.

PMID: 39552718 PMC: 11568808. DOI: 10.22599/bioj.391.


The Multidisciplinary Guidelines for Diagnosis and Referral in Cerebral Visual Impairment.

Boonstra F, Bosch D, Geldof C, Stellingwerf C, Porro G Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:727565.

PMID: 35845239 PMC: 9280621. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.727565.


Perceptual visual dysfunction in children - An Indian perspective.

Pehere N, Dutton G Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(8):2004-2011.

PMID: 34304166 PMC: 8482924. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1996_20.


A pilot study regarding basic knowledge of "cortical visual impairment in children" among ophthalmologists.

Maitreya A, Rawat D, Pandey S Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(2):279-284.

PMID: 29380776 PMC: 5819113. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_425_17.

References
1.
Giaschi D, Regan D, Kraft S, Hong X . Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33(8):2483-9. View

2.
Mercuri E, Anker S, Guzzetta A, Barnett A, Haataja L, Rutherford M . Visual function at school age in children with neonatal encephalopathy and low Apgar scores. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004; 89(3):F258-62. PMC: 1721666. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2002.025387. View

3.
Jacobson L, Ek U, Fernell E, Flodmark O, Broberger U . Visual impairment in preterm children with periventricular leukomalacia--visual, cognitive and neuropaediatric characteristics related to cerebral imaging. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996; 38(8):724-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb12142.x. View

4.
Stiers P, Vanderkelen R, Vandenbussche E . Optotype and grating visual acuity in patients with ocular and cerebral visual impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45(12):4333-9. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0822. View

5.
Flodmark O, Jan J, Wong P . Computed tomography of the brains of children with cortical visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990; 32(7):611-20. View