» Articles » PMID: 26893990

Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Feb 20
PMID 26893990
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery, and free fibular flap is the gold standard for this indication. However, there are alternatives; nonvascular bone grafting is one of them, and we present the costal grafting for mandibular reconstruction, a classic technique that is reliable, efficient, and produced less morbidity than the technique of using composite free flaps.

Method: A 9-year retrospective review of 54 patients treated surgically for mandibular reconstruction was performed. The criterion mainly analyzed was graft survival. The surgical technique was described in detail.

Results: A total of 54 patients with mandibular bone defect were identified. Five symphysis, 46 corpus, and 20 ramus defects were considered. These patients underwent reconstruction by costal grafting, and the engrafting was successful in 92.6% of cases. Dental rehabilitation with dental implants was realized in 70% of cases.

Conclusions: The approach described in this article allowed the authors to obtain good results with costal grafting for mandibular reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. Costal grafting is a good alternative for fibula free flap in specific indications. Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Since the 1980s, the gold standard for these defects is the use of free fibular flap.(1) In some cases, this technique is contradicted; the surgeon then has several possibilities for the use of free osteomyocutaneous flaps (iliac crest, scapula, and serrato-costal flaps).(2-8).

Citing Articles

Planning of physiotherapeutic procedure in patients after mandible reconstruction taking into account donor site: a literature review.

Walatek J, Mysliwiec A, Krakowczyk L, Wolanski W, Lipowicz A, Dowgierd K Eur J Med Res. 2023; 28(1):386.

PMID: 37770987 PMC: 10536701. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01386-y.


Diagnosis and Treatment of a Benign Pediatric Mandible Tumor.

Joy M, Liao C, Magdycz W, Parulis A, Thompson J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7(10):e2452.

PMID: 31772885 PMC: 6846312. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002452.

References
1.
Pogrel M, Podlesh S, Anthony J, Alexander J . A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55(11):1200-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90165-8. View

2.
Hidalgo D . Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84(1):71-9. View

3.
Brown J, Bekiroglu F, Shaw R . Indications for the scapular flap in reconstructions of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 48(5):331-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.09.013. View

4.
Breton P, Souchere B, Bancel B, Freidel M . [A case of aggressive juvenile fibromatosis of the mandible]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1997; 98(4):272-4. View

5.
Netscher D, Alford E, Wigoda P, Cohen V . Free composite myo-osseous flap with serratus anterior and rib: indications in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck. 1998; 20(2):106-12. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199803)20:2<106::aid-hed2>3.0.co;2-6. View