» Articles » PMID: 26891976

Comparison of Molecular, Microscopic, and Culture Methods for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Overview
Journal J Clin Lab Anal
Publisher Wiley
Date 2016 Feb 20
PMID 26891976
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is endemic in the northwest of Isfahan province, Iran. Increase in the incidence of the disease in Kashan has made it necessary to find out the best method for diagnosis and molecular characterization of Leishmania species. In the present study, 130 patients suspected to cutaneous leishmaniosis referred to health care centers of Kashan were examined. Serosity of lesion was collected for smear preparation and cultured in Novy-Nicolle-McNeal medium. DNA was extracted from serosity, and Leishmania species was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested PCR using kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) specific primers. The diagnostic criteria of CL were based on the observation of amastigotes in the smear, promastigotes in culture, presence of expected bands in PCR, or nested PCR. Of 130 specimens, 87 (66.9%), 72 (56.2%), 98 (75.4 %), 96 (73.8%), and 99 (76.2%) were positive for microscopic culture, PCR, nested PCR, and combined PCR and microscopy (proposed method), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of PCR were 99%, 100%, 100%, 96.9%, respectively, for microscopy 87.9%, 100%, 100%, 72.1%, for culture 72.7%, 100%, 100%, 53.4 %, and for nested PCR 97%, 100%, 100%, 91.2%, respectively. Based on the results of the study, kDNA-PCR was the most sensitive method for diagnosis of CL.

Citing Articles

Advances and Challenges in the Diagnosis of Leishmaniasis.

Mehrotra S, Tiwari R, Kumar R, Sundar S Mol Diagn Ther. 2025; 29(2):195-212.

PMID: 39843806 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00762-6.


Infection in Synanthropic Rodents: Evidence for the Urbanization of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ZCL) in Southern Iran.

Shahabi S, Azizi K, Asgari Q, Sarkari B Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2024; 2024:4896873.

PMID: 38487175 PMC: 10940013. DOI: 10.1155/2024/4896873.


Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Lesion on the Ear from Kashan, Central Iran: A Case Report.

Hooshyar H, Rasti S, Rostamkhani P Iran J Parasitol. 2023; 18(1):119-124.

PMID: 37197067 PMC: 10183450. DOI: 10.18502/ijpa.v18i1.12390.


Immunoinformatics Approach to Design a Multi-Epitope Vaccine against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

Naz S, Aroosh A, Caner A, Atalay Sahar E, Toz S, Ozbel Y Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36851219 PMC: 9967539. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020339.


Characterization of spp. Causing Cutaneous Lesions with a Negative Parasitological Diagnosis in Panama.

Reina A, Castillo Mewa J, Calzada J, Saldana A Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022; 7(10).

PMID: 36288023 PMC: 9609048. DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100282.


References
1.
Al-Jawabreh A, Schoenian G, Hamarsheh O, Presber W . Clinical diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a comparison study between standardized graded direct microscopy and ITS1-PCR of Giemsa-stained smears. Acta Trop. 2006; 99(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.07.001. View

2.
Bensoussan E, Nasereddin A, Jonas F, Schnur L, Jaffe C . Comparison of PCR assays for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(4):1435-9. PMC: 1448629. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1435-1439.2006. View

3.
Reithinger R, Dujardin J, Louzir H, Pirmez C, Alexander B, Brooker S . Cutaneous leishmaniasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007; 7(9):581-96. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70209-8. View

4.
Kheirandish F, Chegeni Sharafi A, Kazemi B, Mohebali M, Sarlak A, Tarahi M . Identification of leishmania species using PCR assay on giemsa-stained slides prepared from cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Iran J Parasitol. 2014; 8(3):382-8. PMC: 3887238. View

5.
Kheirandish F, Chegeni Sharafi A, Kazemi B, Bandehpour M, Tarahi M, Khamesipour A . First molecular identification of Leishmania species in a new endemic area of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Lorestan, Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013; 6(9):713-7. DOI: 10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60124-8. View