» Articles » PMID: 26890642

Spatial Angular Compounding of Photoacoustic Images

Overview
Date 2016 Feb 19
PMID 26890642
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Photoacoustic (PA) images utilize pulsed lasers and ultrasound transducers to visualize targets with higher optical absorption than the surrounding medium. However, they are susceptible to acoustic clutter and background noise artifacts that obfuscate biomedical structures of interest. We investigated three spatial-angular compounding methods to improve PA image quality for biomedical applications, implemented by combining multiple images acquired as an ultrasound probe was rotated about the elevational axis with the laser beam and target fixed. Compounding with conventional averaging was based on the pose information of each PA image, while compounding with weighted and selective averaging utilized both the pose and image content information. Weighted-average compounding enhanced PA images with the least distortion of signal size, particularly when there were large (i.e., 2.5 mm and 7 (°)) perturbations from the initial probe position. Selective-average compounding offered the best improvement in image quality with up 181, 1665, and 1568 times higher contrast, CNR, and SNR, respectively, compared to the mean values of individual PA images. The three presented spatial compounding methods have promising potential to enhance image quality in multiple photoacoustic applications.

Citing Articles

Spatiotemporal Coherence Weighting for In Vivo Cardiac Photoacoustic Image Beamformation.

Mukaddim R, Varghese T IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020; 68(3):586-598.

PMID: 32795968 PMC: 8011040. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3016900.


Tomographic imaging with an ultrasound and LED-based photoacoustic system.

Francis K, Boink Y, Dantuma M, Singh M, Manohar S, Steenbergen W Biomed Opt Express. 2020; 11(4):2152-2165.

PMID: 32341873 PMC: 7173893. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.384548.


Multiview spatial compounding using lens-based photoacoustic imaging system.

Francis K, Chinni B, Channappayya S, Pachamuthu R, Dogra V, Rao N Photoacoustics. 2019; 13:85-94.

PMID: 30949434 PMC: 6430722. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.01.002.

References
1.
Wang Y, Li P . SNR-dependent coherence-based adaptive imaging for high-frame-rate ultrasonic and photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014; 61(8):1419-32. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.3051. View

2.
Bell M, Guo X, Song D, Boctor E . Transurethral light delivery for prostate photoacoustic imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2015; 20(3):036002. PMC: 4347512. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.3.036002. View

3.
Entrekin R, Porter B, Sillesen H, Wong A, Cooperberg P, Fix C . Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2001; 22(1):50-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(01)90018-6. View

4.
Bell M, Ostrowski A, Li K, Kazanzides P, Boctor E . Localization of Transcranial Targets for Photoacoustic-Guided Endonasal Surgeries. Photoacoustics. 2015; 3(2):78-87. PMC: 4519806. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2015.05.002. View

5.
Park S, Karpiouk A, Aglyamov S, Emelianov S . Adaptive beamforming for photoacoustic imaging. Opt Lett. 2008; 33(12):1291-3. PMC: 2713818. DOI: 10.1364/ol.33.001291. View