» Articles » PMID: 26887047

Retrospective Study Testing Next Generation Sequencing of Selected Cancer-associated Genes in Resected Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) has a highly heterogeneous outcome. Beyond Gleason Score, Prostate Serum Antigen and tumor stage, nowadays there are no biological prognostic factors to discriminate between indolent and aggressive tumors.The most common known genomic alterations are the TMPRSS-ETS translocation and mutations in the PI3K, MAPK pathways and in p53, RB and c-MYC genes.The aim of this retrospective study was to identify by next generation sequencing the most frequent genetic variations (GVs) in localized and locally advanced PCa underwent prostatectomy and to investigate their correlation with clinical-pathological variables and disease progression.

Results: Identified non-synonymous GVs included TP53 p.P72R (78% of tumors), two CSFR1 SNPs, rs2066934 and rs2066933 (70%), KDR p.Q472H (67%), KIT p.M541L (28%), PIK3CA p.I391M (19%), MET p.V378I (10%) and FGFR3 p.F384L/p.F386L (8%). TP53 p.P72R, MET p.V378I and CSFR1 SNPs were significantly associated with the HI risk group, TP53 and MET variations with T≥T2c. FGFR3 p.F384L/p.F386L was correlated with T≤T2b. MET p.V378I mutation, detected in 20% of HI risk patients, was associated with early biochemical recurrence.

Experimental Design: Nucleic acids were obtained from tissue samples of 30 high (HI) and 30 low-intermediate (LM) risk patients, according to D'Amico criteria. Genomic DNA was explored with the Ion_AmpliSeq_Cancer_Hotspot_Panel_v.2 including 50 cancer-associated genes. GVs with allelic frequency (AF) ≥10%, affecting protein function or previously associated with cancer, were correlated with clinical-pathological variables.

Conclusion: Our results confirm a complex mutational profile in PCa, supporting the involvement of TP53, MET, FGFR3, CSF1R GVs in tumor progression and aggressiveness.

Citing Articles

Androgen Signaling in Prostate Cancer: When a Friend Turns Foe.

Pandey S, Sabharwal U, Tripathi S, Mishra A, Yadav N, Dwivedi-Agnihotri H Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2024; 25(1):37-56.

PMID: 38831575 DOI: 10.2174/0118715303313528240523101940.


Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using RNAseq Approach.

Petiti J, Pignochino Y, Schiavon A, Giugliano E, Berrino E, Giordano G Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612443 PMC: 11011776. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073631.


Genomic Landscape Alterations in Primary Tumor and Matched Lymph Node Metastasis in Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer Patients.

Russo G, Bonacci P, Bivona D, Privitera G, Broggi G, Caltabiano R Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(17).

PMID: 36077746 PMC: 9454441. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174212.


Implementation of a prostate cancer-specific targeted sequencing panel for credentialing of patient-derived cell lines and genomic characterization of patient samples.

Stover E, Oh C, Keskula P, Choudhury A, Tseng Y, Adalsteinsson V Prostate. 2022; 82(5):584-597.

PMID: 35084050 PMC: 8887817. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24305.


The Genetic Germline Background of Single and Multiple Primary Melanomas.

De Summa S, Lasorella A, Strippoli S, Giudice G, Guida G, Elia R Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 7:555630.

PMID: 33748184 PMC: 7973206. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.555630.


References
1.
Lee R, Saylor P, Michaelson M, Rothenberg S, Smas M, Miyamoto D . A dose-ranging study of cabozantinib in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(11):3088-94. PMC: 3684567. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0319. View

2.
Kubler H, van Randenborgh H, Treiber U, Wutzler S, Battistel C, Lehmer A . In vitro cytotoxic effects of imatinib in combination with anticancer drugs in human prostate cancer cell lines. Prostate. 2004; 63(4):385-94. DOI: 10.1002/pros.20201. View

3.
Ecke T, Schlechte H, Schiemenz K, Sachs M, Lenk S, Rudolph B . TP53 gene mutations in prostate cancer progression. Anticancer Res. 2010; 30(5):1579-86. View

4.
Zhang J, Zhuo W, Zheng Y, Zhang Y . Polymorphisms of TP53 codon 72 with prostate carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis. Med Oncol. 2009; 27(2):540-6. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-009-9245-5. View

5.
Bostrom P, Bjartell A, Catto J, Eggener S, Lilja H, Loeb S . Genomic Predictors of Outcome in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(6):1033-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.008. View