» Articles » PMID: 26882927

Examination of Overall Treatment Effect and the Proportion Attributable to Contextual Effect in Osteoarthritis: Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Ann Rheum Dis
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2016 Feb 18
PMID 26882927
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the overall treatment effect and the proportion attributable to contextual effect (PCE) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of diverse treatments for osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Central, Science Citation Index, AMED and CINAHL through October 2014, supplemented with manual search of reference lists, published meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Included were RCTs in OA comparing placebo with representative complementary, pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical treatments. The primary outcome was pain. Secondary outcomes were function and stiffness. The effect size (ES) of overall treatment effect and the PCE were pooled using random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to examine determinants of the PCE.

Results: In total, 215 trials (41 392 participants) were included. The overall treatment effect for pain ranged from the smallest with lavage (ES=0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.68) to the largest with topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ES=1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.55). On average, 75% (PCE=0.75, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.79) of pain reduction was attributable to contextual effect. It varied by treatment from 47% (PCE=0.47, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.70) for intra-articular corticosteroid to 91% (PCE=0.91, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.37) for joint lavage. Similar results were observed for function and stiffness. Treatment delivered by needle/injection and other means than oral medication, longer duration of treatment, large sample size (≥100 per arm) and public funding source were associated with increased PCE for pain reduction.

Conclusions: The majority (75%) of the overall treatment effect in OA RCTs is attributable to contextual effects rather than the specific effect of treatments. Reporting overall treatment effect and PCE, in addition to traditional ES, permits a more balanced, clinically meaningful interpretation of RCT results. This would help dispel the frequent discordance between conclusions from RCT evidence and clinical experience-the 'efficacy paradox'.

Citing Articles

Contextual effects in musculoskeletal pain: are we overlooking essential factors?.

Poulter D, Palese A, Rodeghiero L, Carlino E, Esteves J, Cook C Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1537242.

PMID: 40034938 PMC: 11872922. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1537242.


Sham treatment? Should it be redefined for its use in manual therapy clinical studies?.

Hage R, Demoulin C, Puentedura E, Brismee J J Man Manip Ther. 2025; 33(1):1-3.

PMID: 39785123 PMC: 11770848. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2025.2448921.


Protocol for a multicentre randomised triple-blind controlled trial assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (PIKOA).

Eymard F, Oubaya N, Ornetti P, Sellam J, Richette P, Chevalier X BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e085025.

PMID: 39615889 PMC: 11624835. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085025.


The impact of contextual effects in exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

de Roode A, Heymans M, van Lankveld W, Staal J BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):484.

PMID: 39443961 PMC: 11515505. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03679-3.


Placebo and nocebo effects of percutaneous needle electrolysis and dry-needling: an intra and inter-treatment sessions analysis of a three-arm randomized double-blinded controlled trial in patients with patellar tendinopathy.

Domenech-Garcia V, Pecos-Martin D, Blasco-Abadia J, Bellosta-Lopez P, Lopez-Royo M Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1381515.

PMID: 38903823 PMC: 11187289. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1381515.


References
1.
Walach H, Sadaghiani C, Dehm C, Bierman D . The therapeutic effect of clinical trials: understanding placebo response rates in clinical trials--a secondary analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:26. PMC: 1201145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-26. View

2.
Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J . Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001; 357(9258):757-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6. View

3.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

4.
Colloca L, Lopiano L, Lanotte M, Benedetti F . Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2004; 3(11):679-84. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00908-1. View

5.
Lawrence R, Felson D, Helmick C, Arnold L, Choi H, Deyo R . Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(1):26-35. PMC: 3266664. DOI: 10.1002/art.23176. View