» Articles » PMID: 26881956

Regression Mixture Models: Does Modeling the Covariance Between Independent Variables and Latent Classes Improve the Results?

Overview
Date 2016 Feb 17
PMID 26881956
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regression mixture models are increasingly used as an exploratory approach to identify heterogeneity in the effects of a predictor on an outcome. In this simulation study, we tested the effects of violating an implicit assumption often made in these models; that is, independent variables in the model are not directly related to latent classes. Results indicate that the major risk of failing to model the relationship between predictor and latent class was an increase in the probability of selecting additional latent classes and biased class proportions. In addition, we tested whether regression mixture models can detect a piecewise relationship between a predictor and outcome. Results suggest that these models are able to detect piecewise relations but only when the relationship between the latent class and the predictor is included in model estimation. We illustrate the implications of making this assumption through a reanalysis of applied data examining heterogeneity in the effects of family resources on academic achievement. We compare previous results (which assumed no relation between independent variables and latent class) to the model where this assumption is lifted. Implications and analytic suggestions for conducting regression mixture based on these findings are noted.

Citing Articles

Applying Finite Mixture Models to Quantify Respirable Dust Mass in Coal and Metal-Nonmetal Mines Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.

Weakley A, Parks D, Miller A Appl Spectrosc. 2024; 79(3):364-375.

PMID: 39633308 PMC: 11903167. DOI: 10.1177/00037028241296158.


Characteristics and influencing factors of anticipated HIV stigma among HIV-negative/unknown MSM in China: A regression mixture model.

Dai Z, Wu Y, Liu X, Fu J, Si M, Chen X Brain Behav. 2024; 14(4):e3472.

PMID: 38549560 PMC: 10979188. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3472.


Bayesian inference of spatial and temporal relations in AI patents for EU countries.

Rusek K, Kleszcz A, Cabellos-Aparicio A Scientometrics. 2023; 128(6):3313-3335.

PMID: 37228832 PMC: 10147901. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04699-1.


Effects of Mixing Weights and Predictor Distributions on Regression Mixture Models.

Sherlock P, DiStefano C, Habing B Struct Equ Modeling. 2022; 29(1):70-85.

PMID: 35221645 PMC: 8865476. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508.


The Impact of Imposing Equality Constraints on Residual Variances Across Classes in Regression Mixture Models.

Choi J, Hong S Front Psychol. 2022; 12:736132.

PMID: 35153888 PMC: 8829145. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736132.


References
1.
Muthen B, Brown C, Masyn K, Jo B, Khoo S, Yang C . General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics. 2003; 3(4):459-75. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.4.459. View

2.
Zou Y, Zhang Y, Lord D . Application of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models with varying weight parameters for vehicle crash data analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 50:1042-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.004. View

3.
Van Horn M, Smith J, Fagan A, Jaki T, Feaster D, Masyn K . Not quite normal: Consequences of violating the assumption of normality in regression mixture models. Struct Equ Modeling. 2012; 19(2):227-249. PMC: 3384700. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2012.659622. View

4.
George M, Yang N, Van Horn M, Smith J, Jaki T, Feaster D . Using regression mixture models with non-normal data: Examining an ordered polytomous approach. J Stat Comput Simul. 2013; 83(4):757-770. PMC: 3653334. DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2011.636363. View

5.
Fagan A, Van Horn M, Hawkins J, Jaki T . Differential Effects of Parental Controls on Adolescent Substance Use: For Whom Is the Family Most Important?. J Quant Criminol. 2014; 29(3):347-368. PMC: 4203413. DOI: 10.1007/s10940-012-9183-9. View