» Articles » PMID: 26874707

Unprotected Left Main Disease: Indications and Optimal Strategies for Percutaneous Intervention

Overview
Date 2016 Feb 15
PMID 26874707
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the incidence of left main (LM) coronary artery disease is relatively low in patients undergoing routine angiography, it is a common presentation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. With the current interventional tools and techniques, percutaneous intervention for LM disease has become a viable alternative to the traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Factors that contribute to the success and appropriateness of percutaneous intervention for LM disease include coronary anatomy and patient-specific factors such as left ventricular function. Multiple considerations should be taken into account prior to intervention, including hemodynamic support if necessary, intravascular imaging to guide therapy, and stent technique. This review provides an overview of the current body of literature to support the use of percutaneous intervention in LM disease and serves as guideline for the interventionalist approaching LM revascularization.

Citing Articles

Review of Progress in Interventional Therapy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

Gao C, Li D, Dai H, Liu H, Liu P, Cheng M Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(1):2.

PMID: 39077661 PMC: 11262401. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2501002.


Left Main Coronary Artery Interventions.

Alasnag M, YaQoub L, Saati A, Al-Shaibi K Interv Cardiol. 2019; 14(3):124-130.

PMID: 31871488 PMC: 6926361. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2019.10.R2.

References
1.
Campos C, van Klaveren D, Farooq V, Simonton C, Kappetein A, Sabik 3rd J . Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score.... Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(20):1231-41. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518. View

2.
Bezerra H, Attizzani G, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y . Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6(3):228-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.017. View

3.
Capodanno D, Stone G, Morice M, Bass T, Tamburino C . Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(14):1426-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.005. View

4.
Meier B . The first patient to undergo coronary angioplasty--23-year follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(2):144-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200101113440217. View

5.
Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez Granillo G, Tsuchida K, Garcia-Garcia H, van Mieghem C . Single-vessel versus bifurcation stenting for the treatment of distal left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stenting era. Clinical and angiographic insights into the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital.... Am Heart J. 2006; 152(5):896-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.03.029. View