» Articles » PMID: 26873604

Who Explicitly Requests the Ordering of Computed Tomography for Emergency Department Patients? A Multicenter Prospective Study

Overview
Journal Emerg Radiol
Date 2016 Feb 14
PMID 26873604
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emergency department (ED) computed tomography (CT) use has increased substantially in recent years, resulting in increased radiation exposure for patients. Few studies have assessed which parties contribute to CT ordering in the ED. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of CT scans ordered due to explicit requests by various stakeholders in ED patient care. This is a prospective, observational study performed at three university hospital EDs. CT scans ordered during research assistant hours were eligible for inclusion. Attending emergency physicians (EPs) completed standardized data forms to indicate all parties who had explicitly requested that a specific CT be performed. Forms were completed before the CT results were known in order to minimize bias. Data were obtained from 77 EPs regarding 944 CTs. The parties most frequently requesting CTs were attending EPs (82.0 %, 95 % CI 79.4-84.3), resident physicians (28.6 %, 95 % CI 25.8-31.6), consulting physicians (24.4 %, 95 % CI 21.7-27.2), and admitting physicians (3.9 %, 95 % CI 2.9-5.4). In the 168 instances in which the attending EP did not explicitly request the CT, requests most commonly came from consulting physicians (51.2 %, 95 % CI 43.7-58.6), resident physicians in the ED (39.9 %, 95 % CI 32.8-47.4), and admitting physicians (8.9 %, 95 % CI 5.5-14.2). EPs were the sole party requesting CT in 46.2 % of cases while multiple parties were involved in 39.0 %. Patients, families, and radiologists were uncommon sources of such requests. Emergency physicians requested the majority of CTs, though nearly 20 % were actually not desired by them. Admitting, consulting, and resident physicians in the ED were important contributors to CT utilization.

Citing Articles

Disparities in computed tomography utilization for pediatric blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pediatric and non-pediatric trauma centers.

Hassankhani A, Valizadeh P, Amoukhteh M, Jannatdoust P, Saeedi N, Sabeghi P Emerg Radiol. 2023; 30(6):743-764.

PMID: 37740844 PMC: 10695891. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-023-02172-3.


Are Emergency Medicine Provider Characteristics Associated With Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain?.

Doucett J, Hayden J, Magee K, Ogilvie R Cureus. 2021; 13(3):e13628.

PMID: 33816027 PMC: 8011620. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13628.


Trends in Use of Advanced Imaging in Pediatric Emergency Departments, 2009-2018.

Marin J, Rodean J, Hall M, Alpern E, Aronson P, Chaudhari P JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174(9):e202209.

PMID: 32761186 PMC: 7400208. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2209.


Evidenced-based radiology? A single-institution review of imaging referral appropriateness including monetary and dose estimates for inappropriate scans.

Ryan J, Hollywood A, Stirling A, Glynn M, MacMahon P, Bolster F Ir J Med Sci. 2019; 188(4):1385-1389.

PMID: 30875006 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02005-8.


Prior CT imaging history for patients who undergo whole-body CT for acute traumatic injury and are discharged home from the emergency department.

Matthews M, Richman P, Krall S, Leeson K, Xu K, Gest A BMC Emerg Med. 2018; 18(1):34.

PMID: 30326855 PMC: 6192200. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-018-0186-1.

References
1.
Broder J, Warshauer D . Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol. 2006; 13(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-006-0493-9. View

2.
Broder J, Fordham L, Warshauer D . Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000-2006. Emerg Radiol. 2007; 14(4):227-32. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-007-0618-9. View

3.
Ginde A, Foianini A, Renner D, Valley M, Camargo Jr C . Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15(8):780-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00192.x. View

4.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

5.
Caoili E, Cohan R, Ellis J, Dillman J, Schipper M, Francis I . Medical decision making regarding computed tomographic radiation dose and associated risk: the patient's perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(11):1069-71. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.139. View