» Articles » PMID: 26870143

Relation Between Resistance to Antipseudomonal β-Lactams and AmpC and MexC Genes of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

Overview
Journal Iran J Pathol
Date 2016 Feb 13
PMID 26870143
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In order to select a better antibiotic choice for treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, this study was conducted to determine the frequency of resistance to some antipseudomonal β-lactams in P. aeruginosa isolates from patients in Tehran, Iran. In addition, the relation between presence of genes known to be responsible for resistance to β-lactams (ampC, mexC 1,2, and mexC 3,4 genes) and resistance phenotype among P. aeroginosa isolates was evaluated.

Methods: P. aeruginosa strains were isolated and identified by routine methods and PCR for oprL gene. Disk diffusion method was employed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern according to CLSI recommendations. PCR was used to detect the resistance genes.

Results: Among 100 isolates of P. aeruginosa, 82% had ampC, 86% mexC 1,2 and 89% mexC 3,4 genes and combinations of these genes were seen in most of isolates and only 3% of isolates had none of these genes. Resistance to mezlocillin, cefepime, ceftazidime and piperacillin/ tazobactam was seen in 46%, 41%, 36% and 29% of isolates, respectively. Significant relation (P value ≤0.05 by Chi-square or Fisher Exact test) was observed between the presence of ampC gene and resistance to all the studied β-lactams in this study. No relation was observed for mexC genes, although many of isolates containing these two genes were phenotypically resistant.

Discussion: This study had shown for the first time, the presence of ampC and mexC genes in significant percent of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in Tehran, Iran, and relation between presence of ampC gene and resistance to β-lactams.

Citing Articles

Characterization of Gene Families Encoding Beta-Lactamases of Gram-Negative Rods Isolated from Ready-to-Eat Vegetables in Mexico City.

Vazquez-Lopez R, Solano-Galvez S, Leon-Chavez B, Thompson-Bonilla M, Guerrero-Gonzalez T, Gomez-Conde E High Throughput. 2018; 7(4).

PMID: 30477153 PMC: 6306796. DOI: 10.3390/ht7040036.

References
1.
Ranjbar R, Owlia P, Saderi H, Mansouri S, Jonaidi-Jafari N, Izadi M . Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burned patients hospitalized in a major burn center in Tehran, Iran. Acta Med Iran. 2011; 49(10):675-9. View

2.
Ma D, Cook D, Hearst J, Nikaido H . Efflux pumps and drug resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 1994; 2(12):489-93. DOI: 10.1016/0966-842x(94)90654-8. View

3.
Hancock R, Speert D . Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and impact on treatment. Drug Resist Updat. 2001; 3(4):247-255. DOI: 10.1054/drup.2000.0152. View

4.
Ozer B, Duran N, Onlen Y, Savas L . Efflux pump genes and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from lower respiratory tract infections acquired in an intensive care unit. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2011; 65(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1038/ja.2011.102. View

5.
Strateva T, Yordanov D . Pseudomonas aeruginosa - a phenomenon of bacterial resistance. J Med Microbiol. 2009; 58(Pt 9):1133-1148. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.009142-0. View