» Articles » PMID: 26869473

Relationship Between M100 Auditory Evoked Response and Auditory Radiation Microstructure in 16p11.2 Deletion and Duplication Carriers

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 Feb 13
PMID 26869473
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Deletion and duplication of chromosome 16p11.2 (BP4-BP5) have been associated with developmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorders, and deletion subjects exhibit a large (20-ms) delay of the auditory evoked cortical response as measured by magnetoencephalography (M100 latency). The purpose of this study was to use a multimodal approach to test whether changes in white matter microstructure are associated with delayed M100 latency.

Materials And Methods: Thirty pediatric deletion carriers, 9 duplication carriers, and 39 control children were studied with both magnetoencephalography and diffusion MR imaging. The M100 latency and auditory system DTI measures were compared between groups and tested for correlation.

Results: In controls, white matter diffusivity significantly correlated with the speed of the M100 response. However, the relationship between structure and function appeared uncoupled in 16p11.2 copy number variation carriers. The alterations to auditory system white matter microstructure in the 16p11.2 deletion only partially accounted for the 20-ms M100 delay. Although both duplication and deletion groups exhibit abnormal white matter microstructure, only the deletion group has delayed M100 latency.

Conclusions: These results indicate that gene dosage impacts factors other than white matter microstructure, which modulate conduction velocity.

Citing Articles

Differential links in 16p11.2 deletion carriers reveal aberrant connections between large-scale networks.

Qureshi A, Nielsen J, Sepulcre J Cereb Cortex. 2025; 35(2).

PMID: 40007052 PMC: 11859958. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae474.


Language Profiles of School-Age Children With 16p11.2 Copy Number Variants in a Clinically Ascertained Cohort.

Verbesselt J, Breckpot J, Zink I, Swillen A J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024; 67(11):4487-4503.

PMID: 39418585 PMC: 11567083. DOI: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00257.


The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs.

Auwerx C, Kutalik Z, Reymond A Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(11):2309-2346.

PMID: 39332410 PMC: 11568765. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.015.


Health supervision for children and adolescents with 16p11.2 deletion syndrome.

Chung W, Herrera F Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 38050025 PMC: 10815286. DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a006316.


Contributions to auditory system conduction velocity: insights with multi-modal neuroimaging and machine learning in children with ASD and XYY syndrome.

Berman J, Bloy L, Blaskey L, Jackel C, Miller J, Ross J Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1057221.

PMID: 37252131 PMC: 10219612. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1057221.


References
1.
Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook Jr E, Leventhal B, DiLavore P . The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000; 30(3):205-23. View

2.
Roberts T, Lanza M, Dell J, Qasmieh S, Hines K, Blaskey L . Maturational differences in thalamocortical white matter microstructure and auditory evoked response latencies in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res. 2013; 1537:79-85. PMC: 3970268. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.011. View

3.
Berman J, Chudnovskaya D, Blaskey L, Kuschner E, Mukherjee P, Buckner R . Abnormal auditory and language pathways in children with 16p11.2 deletion. Neuroimage Clin. 2015; 9:50-7. PMC: 4543079. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.07.006. View

4.
Jenkins 3rd J, Chow V, Blaskey L, Kuschner E, Qasmieh S, Gaetz L . Auditory Evoked M100 Response Latency is Delayed in Children with 16p11.2 Deletion but not 16p11.2 Duplication. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 26(5):1957-64. PMC: 6276914. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv008. View

5.
van der Kouwe A, Benner T, Salat D, Fischl B . Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(2):559-569. PMC: 2408694. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.025. View