» Articles » PMID: 26868034

Changes in Consumer Demand Following Public Reporting of Summary Quality Ratings: An Evaluation in Nursing Homes

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2016 Feb 13
PMID 26868034
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Limited consumer use of health care report cards may be due to the large amount of information presented in report cards, which can be difficult to understand. These limitations may be overcome with summary measures. Our objective was to evaluate consumer response to summary measures in the setting of nursing homes.

Data Sources/study Setting: 2005-2010 nursing home Minimum Data Set and Online Survey, Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) datasets.

Study Design: In December 2008, Medicare converted its nursing home report card to summary or star ratings. We test whether there was a change in consumer demand for nursing homes related to the nursing home's star rating after the information was released.

Principal Findings: The star rating system was associated with a significant change in consumer demand for low- and high-scoring facilities. After the star-based rating system was released, 1-star facilities typically lost 8 percent of their market share and 5-star facilities gained over 6 percent of their market share.

Conclusions: The nursing home star rating system significantly affected consumer demand for high- and low-rated nursing homes. These results support the use of summary measures in report cards.

Citing Articles

The elicitation of patient preferences for hip replacement surgery: a discrete choice experiment.

Rohrbacher S, Emmert M BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):268.

PMID: 39966922 PMC: 11834257. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12393-6.


What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?.

Chandra A, Coile C, Mommaerts C J Econ Lit. 2025; 61(2):428-470.

PMID: 39917255 PMC: 11801801. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20211660.


Drinking Water Contaminant Concentrations and Birth Outcomes.

DiSalvo R, Hill E J Policy Anal Manage. 2024; 43(2):368-399.

PMID: 38983462 PMC: 11230651. DOI: 10.1002/pam.22558.


Electronic Health Record Implementation Enhances Financial Performance in High Medicaid Nursing Homes.

Dayama N, Pradhan R, Davlyatov G, Weech-Maldonado R J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:2577-2589.

PMID: 38803618 PMC: 11129737. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S457420.


Public Reporting and Consumer Demand in the Home Health Sector.

Li J Med Care Res Rev. 2024; 81(2):122-132.

PMID: 38235538 PMC: 10939869. DOI: 10.1177/10775587231221852.


References
1.
Pesis-Katz I, Phelps C, Temkin-Greener H, Spector W, Veazie P, Mukamel D . Making difficult decisions: the role of quality of care in choosing a nursing home. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(5):e31-7. PMC: 3670650. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301243. View

2.
Peters E, Dieckmann N, Dixon A, Hibbard J, Mertz C . Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Med Care Res Rev. 2007; 64(2):169-90. DOI: 10.1177/10775587070640020301. View

3.
Marshall M, Shekelle P, Leatherman S, Brook R . The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000; 283(14):1866-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.14.1866. View

4.
Schultz J, Thiede Call K, Feldman R, Christianson J . Do employees use report cards to assess health care provider systems?. Health Serv Res. 2001; 36(3):509-30. PMC: 1089240. View

5.
Grabowski D, Town R . Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards. Health Serv Res. 2011; 46(6pt1):1698-719. PMC: 3393022. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01298.x. View