» Articles » PMID: 26867930

Do Psychological and Behavioral Factors Classified by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (Swedish Version) Predict the Early Clinical Course of Low Back Pain in Patients Receiving Chiropractic Care?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2016 Feb 13
PMID 26867930
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To investigate if psychological and behavioral factors (as determined by the Swedish version of the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory, MPI-S) can predict the early clinical course of Low Back Pain (LBP).

Methods: MPI-S data from patients (18-65 years of age) seeking chiropractic care for recurrent and persistent LBP were collected at the 1(st) visit. A follow-up questionnaire was administered at the 4(th) visit. The predictive value of the MPI-S subgroups Adaptive Copers (AC), Interpersonally Distressed (ID) and Dysfunctional (DYS) was calculated against the subjective improvement at the 4(th) visit and clinically relevant difference in pain intensity between the 1(st) and 4(th) visit.

Results: Of the 666 subjects who were included at the 1(st) visit, 329 completed the questionnaire at the 4(th) visit. A total of 64.7 % (AC), 68.0 % (ID) and 71.3 % (DYS) reported a definite improvement. The chance of "definite improvement", expressed as relative risk (95 % CI) with the AC group as reference, was 1.05 (.87-1.27) for the ID and 1.10 (.93-1.31) for the DYS groups, respectively. The DYS and ID groups reported higher values in pain intensity both at the 1(st) and the 4(th) visit. The proportion of subjects who reported an improvement in pain intensity of 30 % or more (clinically relevant) were 63.5 % AC, 72.0 % ID and 63.2 % DYS. Expressed as relative risk (95 % CI) with the AC group as reference, this corresponded to 1.26 (.91-1.76) for the ID and 1.09 (.78-1.51) for the DYS groups, respectively.

Conclusions: The MPI-S instrument could not predict the early clinical course of recurrent and persistent LBP in this sample of chiropractic patients.

Trial Registration: Clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863 , February 22, 2012.

Citing Articles

Development and evaluation of the MAINTAIN instrument, selecting patients suitable for secondary or tertiary preventive manual care: the Nordic maintenance care program.

Eklund A, Palmgren P, Jakobsson U, Axen I Chiropr Man Therap. 2022; 30(1):15.

PMID: 35300729 PMC: 8932000. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00424-6.


Predicting who responds to spinal manipulative therapy using a short-time frame methodology: Results from a 238-participant study.

Hadizadeh M, Kawchuk G, Prasad N, Fritz J PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0242831.

PMID: 33232379 PMC: 7685475. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242831.


Psychosocial and behavioural characteristics in women with pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain 12 years postpartum.

Bergstrom C, Persson M, Mogren I Chiropr Man Therap. 2019; 27:34.

PMID: 31417671 PMC: 6691525. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-019-0257-8.


The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain-A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Eklund A, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Hagberg J, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kongsted A PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0203029.

PMID: 30208070 PMC: 6135505. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203029.


Validation of the Social support and Pain Questionnaire (SPQ) in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders.

He S, Wang J J Headache Pain. 2017; 18(1):57.

PMID: 28534305 PMC: 5440419. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0766-6.

References
1.
Turk D, Rudy T . Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients: integration of psychological assessment data. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56(2):233-8. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.2.233. View

2.
Lousberg R, van Breukelen G, Groenman N, Schmidt A, Arntz A, Winter F . Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Dutch language version (MPI-DLV). Behav Res Ther. 1999; 37(2):167-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00137-5. View

3.
Haldeman S, Kopansky-Giles D, Hurwitz E, Hoy D, Erwin W, Dagenais S . Advancements in the management of spine disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 26(2):263-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2012.03.006. View

4.
Linton S, Hallden K . Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998; 14(3):209-15. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00007. View

5.
Savigny P, Watson P, Underwood M . Early management of persistent non-specific low back pain: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2009; 338:b1805. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1805. View