» Articles » PMID: 26866919

Intrapericardial Delivery of Cardiosphere-Derived Cells: An Immunological Study in a Clinically Relevant Large Animal Model

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Feb 12
PMID 26866919
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The intrapericardial delivery has been defined as an efficient method for pharmacological agent delivery. Here we hypothesize that intrapericardial administration of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) may have an immunomodulatory effect providing an optimal microenvironment for promoting cardiac repair. To our knowledge, this is the first report studying the effects of CDCs for myocardial repair using the intrapericardial delivery route.

Material And Methods: CDCs lines were isolated, expanded and characterized by flow cytometry and PCR. Their differentiation ability was determined using specific culture media and differential staining. 300,000 CDCs/kg were injected into the pericardial space of a swine myocardial infarcted model. Magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical analysis of pericardial fluid and plasma, cytokine measurements and flow cytometry analysis were performed.

Results: Our results showed that, phenotype and differentiation behavior of porcine CDCs were equivalent to previously described CDCs. Moreover, the intrapericardial administration of CDCs fulfilled the safety aspects as non-adverse effects were reported. Finally, the phenotypes of resident lymphocytes and TH1 cytokines in the pericardial fluid were significantly altered after CDCs administration.

Conclusions: The pericardial fluid could be considered as a safe and optimal vehicle for CDCs administration. The observed changes in the studied immunological parameters could exert a modulation in the inflammatory environment of infarcted hearts, indirectly benefiting the endogenous cardiac repair.

Citing Articles

Intrapericardial injection of hydrogels with ASC and their secretome to treat dilated cardiomyopathies.

Liguori T, Liguori G, Sinkunas V, Correia C, Dos Santos Coutinho E Silva R, Zanoni F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3529.

PMID: 39875493 PMC: 11775170. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87939-z.


The Technique of Permanent Pericardial Catheter in Mice.

Rusinkevich V, Elias D, Vladut Talor M, cihakova D JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2024; 9(10):1234-1247.

PMID: 39534637 PMC: 11551876. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2024.05.015.


Intrapericardial Administration to Achieve Localized and Targeted Treatment for Cardiac Disease.

Xu Y, Chen Y, Tan J, Ooi J, Guo Z J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024; 18(1):28-39.

PMID: 39164600 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10553-3.


An infusible biologically active adhesive for chemotherapy-related heart failure in elderly rats.

Yao J, Li J, Zhu D, Li Y, Tasoudis P, Liu S Bioact Mater. 2024; 40:571-581.

PMID: 39161907 PMC: 11331816. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.06.020.


Therapeutic application of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in myocardial infarction.

Gareev I, Beylerli O, Ilyasova T, Ahmad A, Shi H, Chekhonin V iScience. 2024; 27(5):109791.

PMID: 38736548 PMC: 11088339. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109791.


References
1.
Ege T, Canbaz S, Yuksel V, Duran E . Effect of pericardial fluid pro-inflammatory cytokines on hemodynamic parameters. Cytokine. 2003; 23(1-2):47-51. DOI: 10.1016/s1043-4666(03)00180-7. View

2.
Ishigami S, Ohtsuki S, Tarui S, Ousaka D, Eitoku T, Kondo M . Intracoronary autologous cardiac progenitor cell transfer in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: the TICAP prospective phase 1 controlled trial. Circ Res. 2014; 116(4):653-64. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304671. View

3.
Gressens B, Gohy P . Pericarditis due to interferon-alpha therapy during treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2004; 67(3):301-2. View

4.
Pankuweit S, Wadlich A, Meyer E, Portig I, HUFNAGEL G, Maisch B . Cytokine activation in pericardial fluids in different forms of pericarditis. Herz. 2001; 25(8):748-54. DOI: 10.1007/pl00001993. View

5.
Dib N, Khawaja H, Varner S, McCarthy M, Campbell A . Cell therapy for cardiovascular disease: a comparison of methods of delivery. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010; 4(2):177-81. PMC: 3047684. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-010-9253-z. View