» Articles » PMID: 26865946

Interoperability Between Phenotypes in Research and Healthcare Terminologies--Investigating Partial Mappings Between HPO and SNOMED CT

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Feb 12
PMID 26865946
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identifying partial mappings between two terminologies is of special importance when one terminology is finer-grained than the other, as is the case for the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO), mainly used for research purposes, and SNOMED CT, mainly used in healthcare.

Objectives: To investigate and contrast lexical and logical approaches to deriving partial mappings between HPO and SNOMED CT.

Methods: 1) Lexical approach-We identify modifiers in HPO terms and attempt to map demodified terms to SNOMED CT through UMLS; 2) Logical approach-We leverage subsumption relations in HPO to infer partial mappings to SNOMED CT; 3) Comparison-We analyze the specific contribution of each approach and evaluate the quality of the partial mappings through manual review.

Results: There are 7358 HPO concepts with no complete mapping to SNOMED CT. We identified partial mappings lexically for 33% of them and logically for 82%. We identified partial mappings both lexically and logically for 27%. The clinical relevance of the partial mappings (for a cohort selection use case) is 49% for lexical mappings and 67% for logical mappings.

Conclusions: Through complete and partial mappings, 92% of the 10,454 HPO concepts can be mapped to SNOMED CT (30% complete and 62% partial). Equivalence mappings between HPO and SNOMED CT allow for interoperability between data described using these two systems. However, due to differences in focus and granularity, equivalence is only possible for 30% of HPO classes. In the remaining cases, partial mappings provide a next-best approach for traversing between the two systems. Both lexical and logical mapping techniques produce mappings that cannot be generated by the other technique, suggesting that the two techniques are complementary to each other. Finally, this work demonstrates interesting properties (both lexical and logical) of HPO and SNOMED CT and illustrates some limitations of mapping through UMLS.

Citing Articles

The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2024: phenotypes around the world.

Gargano M, Matentzoglu N, Coleman B, Addo-Lartey E, Anagnostopoulos A, Anderton J Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 52(D1):D1333-D1346.

PMID: 37953324 PMC: 10767975. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad1005.


Ontologizing health systems data at scale: making translational discovery a reality.

Callahan T, Stefanski A, Wyrwa J, Zeng C, Ostropolets A, Banda J NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):89.

PMID: 37208468 PMC: 10196319. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00830-x.


Automated approach for quality assessment of RDF resources.

Zhang S, Benis N, Cornet R BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023; 23(Suppl 1):90.

PMID: 37165363 PMC: 10170671. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02182-8.


Linking rare and common disease vocabularies by mapping between the human phenotype ontology and phecodes.

McArthur E, Bastarache L, Capra J JAMIA Open. 2023; 6(1):ooad007.

PMID: 36875690 PMC: 9976874. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad007.


Identifying Missing Hierarchical Relations in SNOMED CT from Logical Definitions Based on the Lexical Features of Concept Names.

Bodenreider O CEUR Workshop Proc. 2022; 1747.

PMID: 36277863 PMC: 9584353.


References
1.
Oellrich A, Grabmuller C, Rebholz-Schuhmann D . Automatically transforming pre- to post-composed phenotypes: EQ-lising HPO and MP. J Biomed Semantics. 2013; 4(1):29. PMC: 4016257. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-29. View

2.
Robinson P . Deep phenotyping for precision medicine. Hum Mutat. 2012; 33(5):777-80. DOI: 10.1002/humu.22080. View

3.
Dhombres F, Winnenburg R, Case J, Bodenreider O . Extending the coverage of phenotypes in SNOMED CT through post-coordination. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015; 216:795-9. PMC: 5875691. View

4.
Beck T, Free R, Thorisson G, Brookes A . Semantically enabling a genome-wide association study database. J Biomed Semantics. 2012; 3(1):9. PMC: 3579732. DOI: 10.1186/2041-1480-3-9. View

5.
Ogren P, Cohen K, Acquaah-Mensah G, Eberlein J, Hunter L . The compositional structure of Gene Ontology terms. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2004; :214-25. PMC: 2490823. DOI: 10.1142/9789812704856_0021. View