» Articles » PMID: 26859560

Occupational Injuries in Germany: Population-Wide National Survey Data Emphasize the Importance of Work-Related Factors

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Feb 10
PMID 26859560
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unintentional injuries cause much of the global mortality burden, with the workplace being a common accident setting. Even in high-income economies, occupational injury figures remain remarkably high. Because risk factors for occupational injuries are prone to confounding, the present research takes a comprehensive approach. To better understand the occurrence of occupational injuries, sociodemographic factors and work- and health-related factors are tested simultaneously. Thus, the present analysis aims to develop a comprehensive epidemiological model that facilitates the explanation of varying injury rates in the workplace. The representative phone survey German Health Update 2010 provides information on medically treated occupational injuries sustained in the year prior to the interview. Data were collected on sociodemographics, occupation, working conditions, health-related behaviors, and chronic diseases. For the economically active population (18-70 years, n = 14,041), the 12-month prevalence of occupational injuries was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Blockwise multiple logistic regression was applied to successively include different groups of variables. Overall, 2.8% (95% CI 2.4-3.2) of the gainfully employed population report at least one occupational injury (women: 0.9%; 95% CI 0.7-1.2; men: 4.3%; 95% CI 3.7-5.0). In the fully adjusted model, male gender (OR 3.16) and age 18-29 (OR 1.54), as well as agricultural (OR 5.40), technical (OR 3.41), skilled service (OR 4.24) or manual (OR 5.12), and unskilled service (OR 3.13) or manual (OR 4.97) occupations are associated with higher chances of occupational injuries. The same holds for frequent stressors such as heavy carrying (OR 1.78), working in awkward postures (OR 1.46), environmental stress (OR 1.48), and working under pressure (OR 1.41). Among health-related variables, physical inactivity (OR 1.47) and obesity (OR 1.73) present a significantly higher chance of occupational injuries. While the odds for most work-related factors were as expected, the associations for health-related factors such as smoking, drinking, and chronic diseases were rather weak. In part, this may be due to context-specific factors such as safety and workplace regulations in high-income countries like Germany. This assumption could guide further research, taking a multi-level approach to international comparisons.

Citing Articles

Occupational inequalities and gender differences: work accidents, Brazil, 2019.

Gomides L, Abreu M, Assuncao A Rev Saude Publica. 2024; 58:13.

PMID: 38695442 PMC: 11037903. DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005342.


Descriptive analysis and a proposal for a predictive model of fatal occupational accidents in Spain.

Fuentes-Bargues J, Sanchez-Lite A, Gonzalez-Gaya C, Artacho-Ramirez M Heliyon. 2023; 9(11):e22219.

PMID: 38045214 PMC: 10692809. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22219.


Accident injuries of adults in Germany.

Sass A, Kuhnert R, Rommel A J Health Monit. 2023; 2(3):91-97.

PMID: 37168953 PMC: 10165901. DOI: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-072.


Perceived exposure to hazardous working conditions in Germany.

Kroll L, Muters S, Schumann M, Thomas L J Health Monit. 2023; 2(4):116-121.

PMID: 37168132 PMC: 10165919. DOI: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-132.


Co-exposures to physical and psychosocial work factors increase the occurrence of workplace injuries among French care workers.

Colin R, Wild P, Paris C, Boini S Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1055846.

PMID: 36582372 PMC: 9792696. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1055846.


References
1.
Dembe A, Erickson J, Delbos R . Predictors of work-related injuries and illnesses: national survey findings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004; 1(8):542-50. DOI: 10.1080/15459620490478376. View

2.
Sprince N, Pospisil S, Peek-Asa C, Whitten P, Zwerling C . Occupational injuries among workers with diabetes: the National Health Interview Survey, 1997-2005. J Occup Environ Med. 2008; 50(7):804-8. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318168efcf. View

3.
Bush K, Kivlahan D, McDonell M, Fihn S, Bradley K . The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158(16):1789-95. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789. View

4.
Khlat M, Ravaud J, Brouard N, Chau N . Occupational disparities in accidents and roles of lifestyle factors and disabilities: a population-based study in north-eastern France. Public Health. 2008; 122(8):771-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.09.012. View

5.
Veazie M, Smith G . Heavy drinking, alcohol dependence, and injuries at work among young workers in the United States labor force. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001; 24(12):1811-9. View