» Articles » PMID: 26856961

The Peer and Family Smoking Index: A Valid Measure of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Adolescents

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2016 Feb 10
PMID 26856961
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Nearly half of all adolescents in the United States are exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) daily, primarily at home, resulting in respiratory infections, asthma exacerbations, and reduced lung function. A concise self-report measure is needed to identity adolescents exposed to SHS. The purpose of this study was to test whether nonsmoking adolescents who reported exposure to peer and/or family smoking on the Peer and Family Smoking Index had higher salivary cotinine levels than those reporting no exposure to either peer or family smoking.

Methods: A convenience sample of 135 English-speaking adolescents ages 15-18 years was recruited from two high schools. Those who reported use of nicotine replacement therapy, cigarette smoking (past 30 days), smokeless tobacco use (past 30 days), or who self-reported pregnancy were excluded. Salivary cotinine and self-report data from the Peer and Family Smoking Index were collected after obtaining parental consent and assent from the adolescent.

Results: Mean salivary cotinine levels differed by exposure group (none, family, peer, or family and peer), F (3, 130) = 5.44, p = .001. The post hoc analysis identified a significantly higher mean cotinine level among those exposed to SHS from both family and peers than among those with no exposure (p = .001).

Conclusions: Known groups validity of the index was supported. Adolescents who reported family smoking or a combination of family and peer smoking had significantly higher salivary cotinine levels than unexposed adolescents. The Peer and Family Smoking Index is a concise and valid self-report measure for SHS exposure in adolescents.

Citing Articles

Perceptions of African American Youth and Adults Regarding Tobacco Use-Related Factors in Their Community: A Mixed-Methods Approach in Richmond, Virginia.

Hoetger C, White A, Bono R, Hall C, Hood K, Everhart R Fam Community Health. 2024; 47(2):176-190.

PMID: 38372334 PMC: 10878718. DOI: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000398.


Applying the NIEHS translational research framework (NIEHS-TRF) to map clinical environmental health research trajectories.

Castner J, Amiri A, Huntington-Moskos L Nurs Outlook. 2020; 68(3):301-312.

PMID: 32273105 PMC: 9875864. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.01.005.


Missed Opportunities for Detecting Alternative Nicotine Product Use in Youth: Data From the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Isett K, Rosenblum S, Barna J, Hicks D, Gilbert G, Melkers J J Adolesc Health. 2018; 63(5):587-593.

PMID: 30348281 PMC: 7249256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.007.


Parental perceptions of children's exposure to tobacco smoke: development and validation of a new measure.

Myers V, Shiloh S, Rosen L BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):1031.

PMID: 30126404 PMC: 6102809. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5928-1.


Examining the Validity of Self-reported Primary and Secondary Exposure to Cigarette Smoke in Adolescent Girls: The Utility of Salivary Cotinine as a Biomarker.

Beal S, Dorn L, Berga S Subst Use Misuse. 2017; 53(5):792-799.

PMID: 29058521 PMC: 6087668. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1365904.