» Articles » PMID: 26849826

Exploring the Leaf Beetle Fauna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of an Ecuadorian Mountain Forest Using DNA Barcoding

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Feb 6
PMID 26849826
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tropical mountain forests are hotspots of biodiversity hosting a huge but little known diversity of insects that is endangered by habitat destruction and climate change. Therefore, rapid assessment approaches of insect diversity are urgently needed to complement slower traditional taxonomic approaches. We empirically compare different DNA-based species delimitation approaches for a rapid biodiversity assessment of hyperdiverse leaf beetle assemblages along an elevational gradient in southern Ecuador and explore their effect on species richness estimates.

Methodology/principal Findings: Based on a COI barcode data set of 674 leaf beetle specimens (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of 266 morphospecies from three sample sites in the Podocarpus National Park, we employed statistical parsimony analysis, distance-based clustering, GMYC- and PTP-modelling to delimit species-like units and compared them to morphology-based (parataxonomic) species identifications. The four different approaches for DNA-based species delimitation revealed highly similar numbers of molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) (n = 284-289). Estimated total species richness was considerably higher than the sampled amount, 414 for morphospecies (Chao2) and 469-481 for the different MOTU types. Assemblages at different elevational levels (1000 vs. 2000 m) had similar species numbers but a very distinct species composition for all delimitation methods. Most species were found only at one elevation while this turnover pattern was even more pronounced for DNA-based delimitation.

Conclusions/significance: Given the high congruence of DNA-based delimitation results, probably due to the sampling structure, our study suggests that when applied to species communities on a regionally limited level with high amount of rare species (i.e. ~50% singletons), the choice of species delimitation method can be of minor relevance for assessing species numbers and turnover in tropical insect communities. Therefore, DNA-based species delimitation is confirmed as a valuable tool for evaluating biodiversity of hyperdiverse insect communities, especially when exact taxonomic identifications are missing.

Citing Articles

New taxonomic insights for Brazilian Reitter (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), including three new species and their mitochondrial genomes.

Asenjo A, Valois M, Zampaulo R, Molina M, Oliveira R, Oliveira G PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17783.

PMID: 39148684 PMC: 11326439. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17783.


Multiple species delimitation approaches with barcodes poorly fit each other and morphospecies - An integrative taxonomy case of Sri Lankan Sericini chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

Ranasinghe U, Eberle J, Thormann J, Bohacz C, Benjamin S, Ahrens D Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(5):e8942.

PMID: 35600695 PMC: 9120212. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8942.


ONTbarcoder and MinION barcodes aid biodiversity discovery and identification by everyone, for everyone.

Srivathsan A, Lee L, Katoh K, Hartop E, Narayanan Kutty S, Wong J BMC Biol. 2021; 19(1):217.

PMID: 34587965 PMC: 8479912. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01141-x.


Excluding spatial sampling bias does not eliminate oversplitting in DNA-based species delimitation analyses.

Lukic D, Eberle J, Thormann J, Holzschuh C, Ahrens D Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(15):10327-10337.

PMID: 34367578 PMC: 8328443. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7836.


Mitochondrial genome of (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea: Chrysomelidae) and phylogenetic analysis.

Li W, Shen S, Chen H Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2021; 6(4):1541-1543.

PMID: 33969213 PMC: 8079056. DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1914522.


References
1.
Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier C, da Fonseca G, Kent J . Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403(6772):853-8. DOI: 10.1038/35002501. View

2.
Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K . TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2000; 9(10):1657-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x. View

3.
Posada , Crandall . Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(1):37-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)02026-7. View

4.
Templeton A . Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes. Mol Ecol. 2001; 10(3):779-91. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01199.x. View

5.
Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, deWaard J . Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1512):313-21. PMC: 1691236. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218. View