» Articles » PMID: 26846721

The Angiogenic Variation of Skeletal Site-specific Human BMSCs from Same Alveolar Cleft Patients: a Comparative Study

Overview
Journal J Mol Histol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2016 Feb 6
PMID 26846721
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue engineering strategies hold great potential for alveolar cleft reconstruction. Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) from iliac crest and craniofacial regions are candidate seeding cells with site-specific characteristics and bone-repairing properties. Craniofacial BMSCs seem to possess stronger multipotency and osteogenic capabilities than BMSCs isolated from iliac crest. However, the angiogenic capabilities of these two type cell is rarely reported. We obtained human BMSCs (hBMSCs) of maxilla (M-hBMSCs) and iliac crest (I-hBMSCs) from same alveolar cleft patients to investigate the agiogenic variations using co-culture system with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). From in vitro comparison, M-hBMSCs allowed HUVECs to form more tube-like structures and sprouting angiogenesis by tube formation assays and 3D fibrin vasculogenic assay, respectively. By transplantation in vivo, M-hBMSCs enhanced larger size vessel like structures distributed the entire implants compared with I-hBMSCs. Western blotting was used to assess the angiogenesis related factors including hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). The results showed a significant higher expression of bFGF protein in M-hBMSCs and HUVECs co-culture system both in vitro and in vivo. As bFGF could promote migration and proliferation of endothelial cells, scratch wound healing and transwell migration assays were performed as well as MTT assays and cell cycle analysis. The data suggested the effect of M-hBMSCs on HUVECs was stronger than I-hBMSCs. Taken together, these results indicated that craniofacial BMSCs seemed to have greater angiogenesis capability than iliac crest BMSCs and this might be associated with the different levels of bFGF protein expression in co-culture system.

Citing Articles

Mesenchymal stem cells in craniofacial reconstruction: a comprehensive review.

Zheng Z, Liu H, Liu S, Luo E, Liu X Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1362338.

PMID: 38690295 PMC: 11058977. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1362338.


In vivo dynamics of hard tissue-forming cell origins: Insights from Cre/loxP-based cell lineage tracing studies.

Mizoguchi T Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024; 60:109-119.

PMID: 38406212 PMC: 10885318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.01.003.


Effects of HMGB1/TLR4 on secretion IL-10 and VEGF in human jaw bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Kong J, Cheng W, Chang L, Yu J, Wang R, Xie J J Appl Oral Sci. 2024; 32:e20230304.

PMID: 38359267 PMC: 10984578. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0304.


Use of stem cells in bone regeneration in cleft palate patients: review and recommendations.

Amiri M, Lavaee F, Danesteh H J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 48(2):71-78.

PMID: 35491137 PMC: 9065639. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.2.71.


Clinical, Histological, and Scintigraphic Comparative Study of the Use of Mandibular Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood in Bone Neoformation.

Pasquali P, Andre DallAgnol R, Garcia Rezende L, Martinez E Int J Dent. 2022; 2021:4867574.

PMID: 35003261 PMC: 8741402. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4867574.


References
1.
Li Q, Wang Z . Influence of mesenchymal stem cells with endothelial progenitor cells in co-culture on osteogenesis and angiogenesis: an in vitro study. Arch Med Res. 2013; 44(7):504-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.09.009. View

2.
Mikoya T, Inoue N, Matsuzawa Y, Totsuka Y, Kajii T, Hirosawa T . Monocortical mandibular bone grafting for reconstruction of alveolar cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010; 47(5):454-68. DOI: 10.1597/09-172. View

3.
Dong W, Ge J, Zhang P, Fu Y, Zhang Z, Cheng J . Phenotypic characterization of craniofacial bone marrow stromal cells: unique properties of enhanced osteogenesis, cell recruitment, autophagy, and apoptosis resistance. Cell Tissue Res. 2014; 358(1):165-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-014-1927-4. View

4.
Lin R, Moreno-Luna R, Zhou B, Pu W, Melero-Martin J . Equal modulation of endothelial cell function by four distinct tissue-specific mesenchymal stem cells. Angiogenesis. 2012; 15(3):443-55. PMC: 3409933. DOI: 10.1007/s10456-012-9272-2. View

5.
Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Ni A, Dzau V . Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ Res. 2008; 103(11):1204-19. PMC: 2667788. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176826. View