» Articles » PMID: 26843673

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Inhaled Toxicants from Waterpipe and Cigarette Smoking

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Feb 5
PMID 26843673
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) is an emerging trend worldwide. To inform public health policy and educational programming, we systematically reviewed the biomedical literature to compute the inhaled smoke volume, nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide (CO) associated with a single WTS session and a single cigarette.

Methods: We searched seven biomedical bibliographic databases for controlled laboratory or natural environment studies designed to mimic human tobacco consumption. Included studies quantified the mainstream smoke of a single cigarette and/or single WTS session for smoke volume, nicotine, tar, and/or CO. We conducted meta-analyses to calculate summary estimates for the inhalation of each unique substance for each mode of tobacco consumption. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using chi-squared and I-squared statistics.

Results: Sufficient data from 17 studies were available to derive pooled estimates for inhalation of each exposure via each smoking method. Two researchers working independently abstracted measurement of smoke volume in liters, and nicotine, tar, and CO in milligrams. All numbers included in meta-analyses matched precisely between the two researchers (100% agreement, Cohen's k=1.00). Whereas one WTS session was associated with 74.1 liters of smoke inhalation (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.2, 110.0), one cigarette was associated with 0.6 liters of smoke (95% CI 0.5, 0.7). One WTS session was also associated with higher levels of nicotine, tar, and CO.

Conclusions: One WTS session consistently exposed users to larger smoke volumes and higher levels of tobacco toxicants compared with one cigarette. These computed estimates may be valuable to emphasize in prevention programming.

Citing Articles

Temporal and Thematic Analysis of Promotional Waterpipe-Related Posts on Twitter/X in the US.

Ye P, Wu M, Han Y, Shimazaki Y, Ross J, Sutfin E medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39484235 PMC: 11527048. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.17.24315663.


Carbon Monoxide as a Potential Therapeutic Agent: A Molecular Analysis of Its Safety Profiles.

Bansal S, Liu D, Mao Q, Bauer N, Wang B J Med Chem. 2024; 67(12):9789-9815.

PMID: 38864348 PMC: 11215727. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00823.


Prevalence and associated factors of shisha smoking among students in Senegal: Global Youth Tobacco Survey 2020.

Cham B, Weaver S, Jones C, Popova L, Jacques N Tob Induc Dis. 2024; 22.

PMID: 38745595 PMC: 11091866. DOI: 10.18332/tid/186656.


The expression of salivary EGF, VEGF, endothelin, and transferrin in waterpipe and cigarette smokers.

Alrashdan M, Al-Shorman H, Bouzid A, Al-Dwairi A, Alazzam M, Alqudah M Odontology. 2024; 113(1):380-389.

PMID: 38710904 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-00947-9.


Water pipe smoking and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bagherpour-Kalo M, Jones M, Darabi P, Hosseini M Brain Behav. 2024; 14(1):e3357.

PMID: 38376055 PMC: 10761326. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3357.


References
1.
Shihadeh A, Salman R, Jaroudi E, Saliba N, Sepetdjian E, Blank M . Does switching to a tobacco-free waterpipe product reduce toxicant intake? A crossover study comparing CO, NO, PAH, volatile aldehydes, "tar" and nicotine yields. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012; 50(5):1494-8. PMC: 3407543. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.02.041. View

2.
Moir D, Rickert W, Levasseur G, Larose Y, Maertens R, White P . A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007; 21(2):494-502. DOI: 10.1021/tx700275p. View

3.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

4.
Chaouachi K . A critique of the WHO TobReg's "Advisory Note" report entitled: "Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators". J Negat Results Biomed. 2006; 5:17. PMC: 1664583. DOI: 10.1186/1477-5751-5-17. View

5.
Primack B, Shensa A, Kim K, Carroll M, Hoban M, Leino E . Waterpipe smoking among U.S. university students. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012; 15(1):29-35. PMC: 3524056. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts076. View