» Articles » PMID: 26842751

Monitoring Patient Care Through Health Facility Exit Interviews: an Assessment of the Hawthorne Effect in a Trial of Adherence to Malaria Treatment Guidelines in Tanzania

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Feb 5
PMID 26842751
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Survey of patients exiting health facilities is a common way to assess consultation practices. It is, however, unclear to what extent health professionals may change their practices when they are aware of such interviews taking place, possibly paying more attention to following recommended practices. This so-called Hawthorne effect could have important consequences for interpreting research and programme monitoring, but has rarely been assessed.

Methods: A three-arm cluster-randomised trial of interventions to improve adherence to guidelines for the use of anti-malarial drugs was conducted in Tanzania. Patient interviews were conducted outside health facilities on two randomly-selected days per week. Health workers also routinely documented consultations in their ledgers. The Hawthorne effect was investigated by comparing routine data according to whether exit interviews had been conducted on three key indicators of malaria care. Adjusted logistic mixed-effects models were used, taking into account the dependencies within health facilities and calendar days.

Results: Routine data were collected on 19,579 consultations in 18 facilities. The odds of having a malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) result reported were 11 % higher on days when exit surveys were conducted (adjusted odds ratio 95 % CI: 0.98-1.26, p = 0.097), 17 % lower for prescribing an anti-malarial drug to patients with a negative RDT result (0.56-1.23, p = 0.343), and 27 % lower for prescribing an anti-malarial when no RDT result was reported (0.53-1.00, p = 0.052). The effect varied with time, with a U-shaped association over the study period (p < 0.001). We also observed a higher number of consultations recorded on days when exit-interviews were conducted (adjusted mean difference = 2.03, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Although modest, there was some suggestion of better practice by health professionals on days when exit interviews were conducted. Researchers should be aware of the potential Hawthorne effect, and take into account assessment methods when generalising findings to the 'real word' setting. This effect is, however, likely to be context dependent, and further controlled evaluation across different settings should be conducted.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01292707 . Registered on 29th January 2011.

Citing Articles

Truth is relative; Client report versus provider report, a post-modern analysis of data from a trial in the private retail medicine sector.

Chepkwony T, Amunga M, Kimachas E, Kipkoech J, Robie E, Wekesa A Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39502782 PMC: 11537346. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5005686/v1.


Access to quality-assured artemisinin-based combination therapy and associated factors among clients of selected private drug outlets in Uganda.

Ocan M, Nakalembe L, Otike C, Mordecai T, Birungi J, Nsobya S Malar J. 2024; 23(1):128.

PMID: 38689257 PMC: 11059854. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-024-04956-5.


Measuring evidence-based clinical guideline compliance in the paediatric intensive care unit.

Hay R, Martin D, Rutas G, Jamal S, Parsons S BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38429064 PMC: 10910644. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002485.


Defining and evaluating the Hawthorne effect in primary care, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Berkhout C, Berbra O, Favre J, Collins C, Calafiore M, Peremans L Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:1033486.

PMID: 36425097 PMC: 9679018. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1033486.


Supervised versus unsupervised primaquine radical cure for the treatment of falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: a cluster-randomised, controlled, open-label superiority trial.

Poespoprodjo J, Burdam F, Candrawati F, Ley B, Meagher N, Kenangalem E Lancet Infect Dis. 2021; 22(3):367-376.

PMID: 34710363 PMC: 8866132. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00358-3.


References
1.
Rowe S, Olewe M, Kleinbaum D, McGowan Jr J, McFarland D, Rochat R . The influence of observation and setting on community health workers' practices. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18(4):299-305. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl009. View

2.
Eisele T, Silumbe K, Yukich J, Hamainza B, Keating J, Bennett A . Measuring coverage in MNCH: accuracy of measuring diagnosis and treatment of childhood malaria from household surveys in Zambia. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(5):e1001417. PMC: 3646207. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001417. View

3.
Adams A, Soumerai S, Lomas J, Ross-Degnan D . Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999; 11(3):187-92. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.187. View

4.
Herrera S, Vallejo A, Quintero J, Arevalo-Herrera M, Cancino M, Ferro S . Field evaluation of an automated RDT reader and data management device for Plasmodium falciparum/Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic areas of Colombia. Malar J. 2014; 13:87. PMC: 3995821. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-87. View

5.
Baiden F, Owusu-Agyei S, Bawah J, Bruce J, Tivura M, Delmini R . An evaluation of the clinical assessments of under-five febrile children presenting to primary health facilities in rural Ghana. PLoS One. 2011; 6(12):e28944. PMC: 3236777. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028944. View