» Articles » PMID: 26840902

A Randomized Trial of Ketorolac Vs. Sumatripan Vs. Placebo Nasal Spray (KSPN) for Acute Migraine

Overview
Journal Headache
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2016 Feb 4
PMID 26840902
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of ketorolac nasal spray (NS) vs. placebo and sumatriptan NS for the acute treatment of migraine.

Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo and active-comparator, crossover study. Adult migraineurs were randomized to ketorolac NS 31.5 mg, sumatriptan NS 20 mg, or placebo to treat three moderate to severe migraine attacks and switched treatments with each attack. Patients seeking headache care at a headache center or in response to community advertisement were recruited. Adult participants with episodic migraine who experienced ≥2 migraine attacks per month were eligible for the Ketorolac vs. Sumatriptan vs. Placebo Nasal Spray migraine study. Participants were randomized to treatment arms by a research pharmacist, in a 1:1:1 ratio using computer-generated lists. The primary outcome was 2-hour pain relief. Secondary outcomes included 2-hour pain freedom and absence of migraine associated symptoms, and 24-hour sustained pain relief and pain freedom.

Results: Of the 72 randomized participants, 54 (75%) treated at least one attack and 49 (68%) completed all three treatments, for a total of 152 treated migraine attacks. Both ketorolac NS (72.5%, P < .001) and sumatriptan NS (69.4%, P = .001) were more effective than placebo (38.3%) for 2-hour pain relief and 2-hour pain freedom (ketorolac: 43.1%, P = .004; sumatriptan: 36.7%, P = .046; placebo: 18.4%). Ketorolac NS, but not sumatriptan NS, was more effective than placebo in 2-hour absence of nausea. Both ketorolac NS and sumatriptan NS were more effective than placebo for 24-hour sustained pain relief (ketorolac: 49%, P < .001; sumatriptan: 31%, P = .01, placebo: 20%). Only ketorolac NS was superior to placebo for 24-hour (ketorolac: 35.3%, P = .003; sumatriptan: 22.4%, P = .18, placebo: 12.2%) sustained pain freedom. Nasal burning and dysgeusia were the most common adverse effects for active treatments.

Conclusions: This study supports that ketorolac NS is superior to placebo and that it is non-inferior to sumatriptan NS for the acute abortive treatment of migraine.

Citing Articles

Cellular mechanisms of taste disturbance induced by the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac, in mice.

Hirayama A, Iwata S, Oike A, Kawabata Y, Nagasato Y, Takai S Front Cell Neurosci. 2024; 17:1279059.

PMID: 38164437 PMC: 10757961. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1279059.


Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Li G, Duan S, Zhu T, Ren Z, Xia H, Wang Z J Headache Pain. 2023; 24(1):129.

PMID: 37723470 PMC: 10506288. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01662-6.


Revisiting Migraine: The Evolving Pathophysiology and the Expanding Management Armamentarium.

Gawde P, Shah H, Patel H, Bharathi K, Patel N, Sethi Y Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e34553.

PMID: 36879707 PMC: 9985459. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34553.


Improving the Emergency Department Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Pain Crisis: The Role and Options of Sublingual and Intranasally Administered Analgesia.

Ojo A, Odipe O, Owoseni O J Clin Med Res. 2023; 15(1):10-22.

PMID: 36755761 PMC: 9881494. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4841.


Intranasal ketorolac versus intravenous ketorolac for treatment of migraine headaches in children: A randomized clinical trial.

Tsze D, Lubell T, Carter R, Chernick L, DePeter K, McLaren S Acad Emerg Med. 2021; 29(4):465-475.

PMID: 34822214 PMC: 10695685. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14422.


References
1.
Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton R, Scher A . The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007; 27(3):193-210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01288.x. View

2.
Ashkenazi A, Silberstein S, Jakubowski M, Burstein R . Improved identification of allodynic migraine patients using a questionnaire. Cephalalgia. 2007; 27(4):325-9. PMC: 2664545. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01291.x. View

3.
Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon S, Kosinski M . Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2010; 31(3):357-67. PMC: 3057423. DOI: 10.1177/0333102410379890. View

4.
Tepper S, Kori S, Borland S, Wang M, Hu B, Mathew N . Efficacy and safety of MAP0004, orally inhaled DHE in treating migraines with and without allodynia. Headache. 2011; 52(1):37-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02041.x. View

5.
Pfaffenrath V, Fenzl E, Bregman D, Farkkila M . Intranasal ketorolac tromethamine (SPRIX(R)) containing 6% of lidocaine (ROX-828) for acute treatment of migraine: safety and efficacy data from a phase II clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2012; 32(10):766-77. DOI: 10.1177/0333102412451359. View