» Articles » PMID: 26835458

The - Not So - Solid 5.5 cm Threshold for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Facts, Misinterpretations, and Future Directions

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26835458
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) represent a focal dilation of the aorta exceeding 1.5 times its normal diameter. It is reported that 4-8% of men and 0.5-1% of women above 50 years of age bear an AAA. Rupture represents the most disastrous complication of aneurysmal disease that is accompanied by an overall mortality of 80%. Autopsy data have shown that nearly 13% of AAAs with a maximum diameter ≤5 cm were ruptured and 60% of the AAAs >5 cm in diameter never ruptured. It is therefore obvious that the "maximum diameter criterion," as a single parameter that fits all patients, is obsolete. Investigators have begun a search for more reliable rupture risk markers for AAA expansion, such as the level and change of peak wall stress or AAA geometry. Furthermore, it is becoming more and more evident that intraluminal thrombus (ILT), which is present in 75% of all AAAs, affects AAA features and promotes their expansion. Though these hemodynamic properties of AAAs are significant and seem to better describe rupture risk, they are in need of specialized equipment and software and demand time for processing making them difficult in use and unattractive to clinicians in everyday practice. In the search for the addition of other risk factors or user-friendly tools, which may predict AAA expansion and rupture, the use of the asymmetrical ILT deposition index seems appealing since it has been reported to identify AAAs that may have an increased or decreased growth rate.

Citing Articles

New Trends of Personalized Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.

Alsabbagh Y, Erben Y, Vandenberg J, Farres H J Pers Med. 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39728062 PMC: 11677056. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14121148.


Computational Hemodynamics-Based Growth Prediction for Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Laminar Simulations Versus Large Eddy Simulations.

Rezaeitaleshmahalleh M, Lyu Z, Mu N, Wang M, Zhang X, Rasmussen T Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(11):3078-3097.

PMID: 39020077 PMC: 11772086. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03572-3.


On the Importance of Including Cohesive Zone Models in Modelling Mixed-Mode Aneurysm Rupture.

Concannon J, Mairtin E, FitzGibbon B, Hynes N, Sultan S, McGarry J Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024; 15(5):633-646.

PMID: 38987509 PMC: 11582104. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-024-00740-3.


On the Impact of Residual Strains in the Stress Analysis of Patient-Specific Atherosclerotic Carotid Vessels: Predictions Based on the Homogenous Stress Hypothesis.

Mastrofini A, Marino M, Karlof E, Hedin U, Gasser T Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(5):1347-1358.

PMID: 38349443 PMC: 10995094. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03458-4.


An artificial intelligence based abdominal aortic aneurysm prognosis classifier to predict patient outcomes.

Chung T, Gueldner P, Aloziem O, Liang N, Vorp D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3390.

PMID: 38336915 PMC: 10858046. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53459-5.


References
1.
Georgakarakos E, Gasser T, Xenos M, Kontopodis N, Georgiadis G, Ioannou C . Applying findings of computational studies in vascular clinical practice: fact, fiction, or misunderstanding?. J Endovasc Ther. 2014; 21(3):434-8. DOI: 10.1583/14-4718E.1. View

2.
Manning B, Kristmundsson T, Sonesson B, Resch T . Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: a comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50(2):263-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.243. View

3.
DARLING R, Messina C, Brewster D, Ottinger L . Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation. 1977; 56(3 Suppl):II161-4. View

4.
Cao P, de Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E . Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010; 41(1):13-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.026. View

5.
Metaxa E, Kontopodis N, Tzirakis K, Ioannou C, Papaharilaou Y . Effect of intraluminal thrombus asymmetrical deposition on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate. J Endovasc Ther. 2015; 22(3):406-12. DOI: 10.1177/1526602815584018. View