» Articles » PMID: 26835004

A Pocket Guide to Electronic Laboratory Notebooks in the Academic Life Sciences

Overview
Journal F1000Res
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26835004
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Every professional doing active research in the life sciences is required to keep a laboratory notebook. However, while science has changed dramatically over the last centuries, laboratory notebooks have remained essentially unchanged since pre-modern science. We argue that the implementation of electronic laboratory notebooks (eLN) in academic research is overdue, and we provide researchers and their institutions with the background and practical knowledge to select and initiate the implementation of an eLN in their laboratories. In addition, we present data from surveying biomedical researchers and technicians regarding which hypothetical features and functionalities they hope to see implemented in an eLN, and which ones they regard as less important. We also present data on acceptance and satisfaction of those who have recently switched from paper laboratory notebook to an eLN.  We thus provide answers to the following questions: What does an electronic laboratory notebook afford a biomedical researcher, what does it require, and how should one go about implementing it?

Citing Articles

Ten simple rules for implementing electronic lab notebooks (ELNs).

Vandendorpe J, Adam B, Wilbrandt J, Lindstadt B, Forstner K PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(6):e1012170.

PMID: 38900775 PMC: 11189195. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012170.


Digitalization concepts in academic bioprocess development.

Habich T, Beutel S Eng Life Sci. 2024; 24(4):2300238.

PMID: 38584688 PMC: 10991719. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.202300238.


Ten simple rules for establishing an experimental lab.

Kaiser M PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(1):e1011778.

PMID: 38271301 PMC: 10810451. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011778.


A guide to open science practices for animal research.

Diederich K, Schmitt K, Schwedhelm P, Bert B, Heinl C PLoS Biol. 2022; 20(9):e3001810.

PMID: 36108043 PMC: 9514607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001810.


Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research.

Drude N, Martinez-Gamboa L, Haven T, Holman C, Holst M, Kniffert S BMC Res Notes. 2022; 15(1):270.

PMID: 35922820 PMC: 9351171. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-06108-x.


References
1.
Voegele C, Bouchereau B, Robinot N, McKay J, Damiecki P, Alteyrac L . A universal open-source Electronic Laboratory Notebook. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29(13):1710-2. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt253. View

2.
Rubacha M, Rattan A, Hosselet S . A review of electronic laboratory notebooks available in the market today. J Lab Autom. 2011; 16(1):90-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jala.2009.01.002. View

3.
Nussbeck S, Weil P, Menzel J, Marzec B, Lorberg K, Schwappach B . The laboratory notebook in the 21st century: The electronic laboratory notebook would enhance good scientific practice and increase research productivity. EMBO Rep. 2014; 15(6):631-4. PMC: 4197872. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201338358. View

4.
Nickla J, Boehm M . Proper laboratory notebook practices: protecting your intellectual property. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2010; 6(1):4-9. PMC: 3153662. DOI: 10.1007/s11481-010-9237-4. View

5.
Walsh E, Cho I . Using Evernote as an electronic lab notebook in a translational science laboratory. J Lab Autom. 2012; 18(3):229-34. DOI: 10.1177/2211068212471834. View