» Articles » PMID: 26834937

Agent-based Computational Model of the Prevalence of Gonococcal Infections After the Implementation of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Guidelines

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2016 Feb 3
PMID 26834937
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, the first comprehensive guidelines were published for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the prevention of HIV infection in populations with substantial risk of infection. Guidelines include a daily regimen of emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF/FTC) as well as condom usage during sexual activity. The relationship between the TDF/FTC intake regimen and condom usage is not yet fully understood. If men who have sex with men (MSM,) engage in high-risk sexual activities without using condoms when prescribed TDF/FTC they might be at an increased risk for other sexually transmitted diseases (STD). Our study focuses on the possible occurrence of behavioral changes among MSM in the United States over time with regard to condom usage. In particular, we were interested in creating a model of how increased uptake of TDF/FTC might cause a decline in condom usage, causing significant increases in non-HIV STD incidence, using gonococcal infection incidence as a biological endpoint. We used the agent-based modeling software NetLogo, building upon an existing model of HIV infection. We found no significant evidence for increased gonorrhea prevalence due to increased PrEP usage at any level of sample-wide usage, with a range of 0-90% PrEP usage. However, we did find significant evidence for decreased prevalence of HIV, with a maximal effect being reached when 5% to 10% of the MSM population used PrEP. Our findings appear to indicate that attitudes of aversion, within the medical community, toward the promotion of PrEP due to the potential risk of increased STD transmission are unfounded.

Citing Articles

Estimating Partnership Duration among MSM in Belgium-A Modeling Study.

Tsoumanis A, Vanden Berghe W, Hens N, Van Dijck C Infect Dis Rep. 2024; 16(3):435-447.

PMID: 38804442 PMC: 11130929. DOI: 10.3390/idr16030032.


Sustainability of religious communities.

Jo C, Kim D, Lee J PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0250718.

PMID: 33961629 PMC: 8104927. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250718.


How various design decisions on matching individuals in relationships affect the outcomes of microsimulations of sexually transmitted infection epidemics.

Geffen N, Scholz S PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0202516.

PMID: 30157216 PMC: 6114846. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202516.


Behavioural, not biological, factors drive the HCV epidemic among HIV-positive MSM: HCV and HIV modelling analysis including HCV treatment-as-prevention impact.

MacGregor L, Martin N, Mukandavire C, Hickson F, Weatherburn P, Hickman M Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 46(5):1582-1592.

PMID: 28605503 PMC: 5837478. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx075.

References
1.
Vittinghoff E, Douglas J, Judson F, McKirnan D, MacQueen K, Buchbinder S . Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010003. View

2.
Rietmeijer C, Patnaik J, Judson F, Douglas Jr J . Increases in gonorrhea and sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men: a 12-year trend analysis at the Denver Metro Health Clinic. Sex Transm Dis. 2003; 30(7):562-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-200307000-00006. View

3.
Golub S, Kowalczyk W, Weinberger C, Parsons J . Preexposure prophylaxis and predicted condom use among high-risk men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010; 54(5):548-55. PMC: 2908204. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181e19a54. View

4.
Roland M, Neilands T, Krone M, Katz M, Franses K, Grant R . Seroconversion following nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis against HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(10):1507-13. DOI: 10.1086/497268. View

5.
Kalichman S, Rompa D, Cage M, DiFonzo K, Simpson D, Austin J . Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce HIV transmission risks in HIV-positive people. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21(2):84-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00324-5. View